Page 1 of 3

Re: slightly o/t definitions of Model work

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 1:31 pm
by KayJay


Sums it up nicely and briefly.

Re: slightly o/t definitions of Model work

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:55 pm
by Peter
Just remember those definitions of UK mag and US mag bear no relationship to the strength of work being bought by UK and US magazines.

Twee little terms like this belong back in the 1980s amateur glamour hire studio.

Re: slightly o/t definitions of Model work

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:45 pm
by Will Hagen
We also know that many models advertise that their limits are lower than what they will actually perform.

Re: slightly o/t definitions of Model work

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:05 pm
by Joe A
And as we guys have discussed so many time on model forums..

We advertise for toys, topless or nude and dumb models reply saying they do it all but only implied .. Will that do.. LOL

Most of us spell out exactly what the paid work is and we still get them replying with that.. :)


Re: slightly o/t definitions of Model work

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:39 pm
by Peter

>
> We advertise for toys, topless or nude and dumb models reply
> saying they do it all but only implied .. Will that do.. LOL
>
>

Had someone looking for 'tasteful continental' this week!

Re: slightly o/t definitions of Model work

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:43 pm
by Peter
photo-taker wrote:

> Twee is nice?
>

Yep, as in "I don't want to say I want to photograph you shoving a dildo in your pussy, so i'll use a misleading term in order to seem polite."


Perpetuating these outdated terms only leads to confusion and embarassing situations for both parties, the sooner they are banished from pro work the better.

Re: slightly o/t definitions of Model work

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:51 pm
by Joe A
Peter..

I knew you would have a good tale to tell.. LOL.

As for "Had someone looking for 'tasteful continental' this week!"

Maybe she wanted to use her favourite food as she likes the taste :)