Page 1 of 1
www.johnmason.studio.com
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm
by mackdaddy
Check out this little gem of a website. Features all your favourite page 3 and video girls, housewives the lot. When are we going to see
www.britishbangers.com showcasing One Eyed Jack stuff?
Re: www.johnmason.studio.com
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2001 1:58 am
by joey
looks like the right url..
"a-z lookup" at is nice to have for free.
Re: www.johnmason.studio.com
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2001 8:19 am
by Aaron Copeland
I joined the site but was disappointed by the small size and indifferent quality of the pics. Pity, because the range of girls is excellent.
Re: www.johnmason.studio.com
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2001 5:51 pm
by Webmaster JMS
Hi Aaron,
Got a note from John via someone who'd seen your note about johnmasonstudio.com.
At present, JMS is being rebuilt and, within the next couple of weeks, you should find around 500 sets of John's on the site, including his Page 3 stuff, and loads and loads of British girls. We had a problem with the initial scans, which were very poor, and we're sorry you were disappointed with them. However, the designer who had initially been involved with the project has now left, and the new team are ? if I do say so modestly myself ? well up for it.
johnmasonstudio.com now features stills from a lot of One Eyed Jack movies, which means lots and lots of British girls doing hardcore. You won't see them anywhere else, except for the only hardcore mag John sells to which is Too Blue Hardcore. John says they can't show anal and cum shots, so you'll get all those on the site. Since John switched to digital, his sets on the site are now between 60 and 80 images in length, and I've tried to vary the poses as much as I can. We've also got MPEGs (hardcore) on site now, as well as resident girls like Michelle Thorne (some nice porn stuff on her), Tia, Linda Murray, Vika and a lot more. Please have another look Aaron. I'd hate you to judge us on a site that we were trying to fix when you joined. I'd also hate other BGAFD visitors to get the wrong impression of John's work.