Page 1 of 1
SwingalongaBen: attn Alec
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:34 pm
by MikeA
This title has been added in the latest update, with five new actresses: Chelsea [3], Kimberley [4], Louise [16], Rachel [8] and Tiffany [3]. However, all the actresses have done other films and are already in the database as
Andrea [4],
Kimberley [3],
Louise [14],
Rachel [7] and
Tiffany [2] respectively.
All the girls can also be found on the Johnny Rebel site in what look like stills and clips from the same scenes.
As has already been remarked on the forum, this is a very disappointing DVD for Ben Dover fans: there is none of Ben's usual banter and humour -- just a short introductory voice-over to each scene -- and he doesn't appear on screen.
Re: SwingalongaBen: attn Alec
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:00 pm
by alec
Thanks a lot.
Re: SwingalongaBen: attn Alec
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:29 am
by Ned
MikeA wrote:
> As has already been remarked on the forum, this is a very
> disappointing DVD for Ben Dover fans: there is none of Ben's
> usual banter and humour -- just a short introductory voice-over
> to each scene -- and he doesn't appear on screen.
>
>
Yep and featuring some blokes who make me think even I would be acceptable, if only I could pass what appear to be increasingly demanding requirements for getting into the industry.
Sadly, I don't have a six foot dick and can't shoot peanuts out of a squirrel's grasp at 30 yards with my cum shot. !wink!
Re: SwingalongaBen: attn Alec
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:32 pm
by one eyed jack
Yeah...nor can most porn stars. What kind of movies you been watching???????
Re: SwingalongaBen: attn Alec
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:15 pm
by Ned
Just a light-hearted comment after reading a couple of the posts offering work for blokes in the promotions forum, where requirements appeared to be a little more demanding than usual.
It's always been a bit of a mystery to me that British porn is about the natural look of the girls, yet when there are posts about men getting work it's always stuff like "Must have at least ten inches, a twelve pack stomach" etc etc
Strange old business in some ways.
Re: SwingalongaBen: attn Alec
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:29 pm
by one eyed jack
Ned wrote: Strange old business in some ways.
Ha ha ha...yes you wouldnt believe. people are getting very competitive now. No one wants natural performances. It is all contrived to make a final end product. Most performers give you a strange look if you want something natural...then again some patrons of porn find natural perfomances dull/ or natural equates wasting time as the guy does everything but get wood to see the job through.
The industry needs mindless automatons with wood! Beep...Must fuck woo-man...Must fuck puss-y...Must -cum on face....Beep!
Re: SwingalongaBen: attn Alec
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:13 pm
by Ned
Natural performances maybe suggest "amateur" to some people, but I know what you mean.
Take anal as an example. In most DVDs/videos, it is a forceful act. No matter how big the cock, it gets rammed home and usually doggy style, or with the woman reverse cowgirling the bloke.
In reality I find that anal is one of the most tender and intimately rewarding things you can do with a partner. Face her, look into her eyes, do it gently and the expressions you are rewarded with are 90% of the attraction of doing it. There have been ladies I have known who love it a lot harder, sometimes to the point where it felt like abuse, but mostly it's been a loving thing... Soft old tart I sound there !wink!
In porn it's like "Doing the slut", which is fine if you're in the mood, but I've often thought to myself "Fucking hell, that has GOT to hurt" during scenes and that's a mood killer.
Sidetracked the thread there.