Page 1 of 2

channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 1:43 pm
by zasuna
last night i watched the euro blue review and came to the conclusion that if phil mcavity is one of the major players in this country i will be looking aboard for my smut in the future.
low budget,ugly girls,his dads camper van and a video camera that antiques roadshow would value for insurance purposes all add up to low quality rubbish.
on a different note i just loved the shades and that body warmer was pure class,did i come from millets,porn star chic i can see it being the look of the winter


the mighty zasuna has spoken

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 2:10 pm
by Diem
The mighty zasuna has spoken bollocks.

Each to their own - either offer constructive criticism or be quiet.

And how do you define ugly? Every single woman I have seen with Phil McC (and in about 99% of the porn I've seen) have far more "attractive" features than "ugly" ones.

I suppose your wife/girlfriend/boyfriend/partner/significant other is an international sex symbol? If not why not?


D

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 2:15 pm
by Maurie
Vast expense, 65 quid, I thought this was joking, if so, hilarious. IIs that spelt right?)

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 2:29 pm
by zasuna
hey this is a forum about british porn good or bad and my comments are what i feel i have no problem that you disagree with that.
i define ugly as somebody i find unattractive and would not fancy pulling me pud over.i'm just fed up with people who say all porn is good porn,come on 99% of stars are not stunners you only have to trawl round the girls section on this site to see that.
if my missus was an international sex symbol do you really think i would be on this forum talking about draining my middle vein.


all hail the mighty zasuna

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 3:43 pm
by marcus allen
Beauty(quoth the Bard) is in the eye of the beholder.
Jim came across as the straightforward guy he is. Some like his products-some do not. There is sometimes a lot of rubbish about which country has the best for this or the best for that. Since most of you guys have access to all sorts of porn, why not simply buy you own preference & don't knock (even by implication) other peoples tastes, predilections or efforts.
Anyway, I'm personally very upset because he failed to wear the famous kilt. For the uninitiated, it is sight to behold.

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 4:02 pm
by Dr diddler
i have noticed aaaaactuaally that the photographs on this forum do little justice for the girls. a lot of the stunners on video look quite plain in their snapshots. go look at Jacqui Ebonys photo and then watch her in a filum she looks nothing like her photo (if you see what i mean?)

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 4:03 pm
by Diem
I'm with Mr Allen on this one.

I have spent many hours looking at all the girls on this site and can honestly say that 99% would be worth a wank or two.

It could be that I at 24 years old I can still get turned on by the female form in all its shapes and sizes. Sure I have preferences but I am not critical of the girls who are not my 'ideal'. I reserve my critism to those who only find fault with others. Personally I find the Fuck Truck concept a 'novel' one (Think Sir Humphery Appleby) but I still get turned on by the girls and Phil & Co getting it on.

Criticise constructively or not at all is what I say (and would be of more use to people like Phil and Ben who actually make the films)


D

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 4:29 pm
by Raven
Spot on marcus.....I thought Jim came across very well and Violet was very professional I thought the whole thing was done well and made the industry look good instead of bad and ugly...
Well done Jim and Violet.

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 5:09 pm
by marcus allen
Re Diddler,
Quite right, I know personally all the girls featured last night& their pix CERTAINLY did no justice to them. This ,in general ,is because on location, girls are either made up or not,
depending on the type of shoot involved and the image intended to project. See them in a different environment & you'd probably have the reaction-"WOW, who the fuck is thAt!"
To Everyone else, may I ask what you think when you wake up next to a warm friendly body-known or otherwise?

Re: channel 5 last night

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2001 5:16 pm
by Hootsmon
Well I watched Channel 5 last night, and I have to say that there is only one word to describe Phil.....Handsome...Umm, no no that's not it(just kidding Phil)....Lucky yeah that's it!!

I thought that Violet was stunning looking last night, and seemed to be a very nice person. What other girlfriend have you known not to do her dinger if you turned to her and said,"So are you going to Give me a Blow-Job then?"
I can remember when Violet was quite Goth-like in her appearance(she scared me a little to be truthful!), and it now seems that the Love of a good man(which Phil, or Jim(Never quite saw him as a Jim person though) seems to be!) has changed Violet and now I think that she is really attractive.....Your a Lucky Man Phil!!

Three Beers for Phil and Violet!!

Hootsmon :o)

P.S. As we now have no First Minister in Scotland Phil, do you see yourself as Our New First Minister of Porn??...I think people would trust you a hell of a lot more than the present bunch!!!