Pornostatic: anti-anal?
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:35 pm
Just acquired four of their titles [for the record, Cum Into My
Office 2/Hardcore Club Babes 3/Hardcore Rock Chicks 2/Soccer Babes
4] and despite featuring famous 'anal queens' like Natalie Heck and
Sabrina Lavelle the only ass-action in the entire lot was a brief go by
Tara Summers.
Is there an agenda here, and if so who's driving it? Killergram? The
girls? The non-existent God knows, I don't demand wall-to-wall anal
but there I feel there ought to be at least more than on offer here.
My previous forays into Pornostatic territory have found a fair amount
of 'backdoor fun' [not tons, but enough to keep me reasonably happy]
but this is a rectal desert. It especially grates with the frequent bbg
scenes- after watching three or four such I stared to get a feeling of
being ever-so-slightly led up the garden path.......I am firmly of the
opinion [OK, possibly with tongue in cheek] that the only reason two
males should ever be present in one scene is for the DP.
And while I'm here having a whinge [determined to get my moneys'
worth], could whoever shoots this stuff please allow something like 2%
[surely that's not unreasonable] 'stand-back' shooting out of the total,
so we can admire the togs properly? Otherwise what's the point of
dressing the girls up? The 'in yer face' stuff also gets a little vertiginous
after watching several scenes in quick successsion....There also seems to
be a positive aversion to capturing high heels and the lower leg.....
particularly galling to someone such as myself who believes firmly that
Where God Went Totally Doolally And Screwed Up the Universe For All
Eternity was in not arranging for women to be born in nylons and
stilettos.
Just to balance things a little the pic-quality has improved vastly
compared to some of the earlier efforts, and the girls are much better
made-up than in the somewhat garish fashion they sometimes sported
in the 'early days'. Practice makes perfect, I guess.....
Office 2/Hardcore Club Babes 3/Hardcore Rock Chicks 2/Soccer Babes
4] and despite featuring famous 'anal queens' like Natalie Heck and
Sabrina Lavelle the only ass-action in the entire lot was a brief go by
Tara Summers.
Is there an agenda here, and if so who's driving it? Killergram? The
girls? The non-existent God knows, I don't demand wall-to-wall anal
but there I feel there ought to be at least more than on offer here.
My previous forays into Pornostatic territory have found a fair amount
of 'backdoor fun' [not tons, but enough to keep me reasonably happy]
but this is a rectal desert. It especially grates with the frequent bbg
scenes- after watching three or four such I stared to get a feeling of
being ever-so-slightly led up the garden path.......I am firmly of the
opinion [OK, possibly with tongue in cheek] that the only reason two
males should ever be present in one scene is for the DP.
And while I'm here having a whinge [determined to get my moneys'
worth], could whoever shoots this stuff please allow something like 2%
[surely that's not unreasonable] 'stand-back' shooting out of the total,
so we can admire the togs properly? Otherwise what's the point of
dressing the girls up? The 'in yer face' stuff also gets a little vertiginous
after watching several scenes in quick successsion....There also seems to
be a positive aversion to capturing high heels and the lower leg.....
particularly galling to someone such as myself who believes firmly that
Where God Went Totally Doolally And Screwed Up the Universe For All
Eternity was in not arranging for women to be born in nylons and
stilettos.
Just to balance things a little the pic-quality has improved vastly
compared to some of the earlier efforts, and the girls are much better
made-up than in the somewhat garish fashion they sometimes sported
in the 'early days'. Practice makes perfect, I guess.....