Page 1 of 2

Pornostatic: anti-anal?

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:35 pm
by jj
Just acquired four of their titles [for the record, Cum Into My
Office 2/Hardcore Club Babes 3/Hardcore Rock Chicks 2/Soccer Babes
4] and despite featuring famous 'anal queens' like Natalie Heck and
Sabrina Lavelle the only ass-action in the entire lot was a brief go by
Tara Summers.

Is there an agenda here, and if so who's driving it? Killergram? The
girls? The non-existent God knows, I don't demand wall-to-wall anal
but there I feel there ought to be at least more than on offer here.
My previous forays into Pornostatic territory have found a fair amount
of 'backdoor fun' [not tons, but enough to keep me reasonably happy]
but this is a rectal desert. It especially grates with the frequent bbg
scenes- after watching three or four such I stared to get a feeling of
being ever-so-slightly led up the garden path.......I am firmly of the
opinion [OK, possibly with tongue in cheek] that the only reason two
males should ever be present in one scene is for the DP.

And while I'm here having a whinge [determined to get my moneys'
worth], could whoever shoots this stuff please allow something like 2%
[surely that's not unreasonable] 'stand-back' shooting out of the total,
so we can admire the togs properly? Otherwise what's the point of
dressing the girls up? The 'in yer face' stuff also gets a little vertiginous
after watching several scenes in quick successsion....There also seems to
be a positive aversion to capturing high heels and the lower leg.....
particularly galling to someone such as myself who believes firmly that
Where God Went Totally Doolally And Screwed Up the Universe For All
Eternity was in not arranging for women to be born in nylons and
stilettos.

Just to balance things a little the pic-quality has improved vastly
compared to some of the earlier efforts, and the girls are much better
made-up than in the somewhat garish fashion they sometimes sported
in the 'early days'. Practice makes perfect, I guess.....


Re: Pornostatic: anti-anal?

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:46 am
by Porn Baron
As I said in a previous thread not so long ago anal seems to be going out of fashion. Not too concerned myself as there was far too much for my liking. But having looked at the American sites too I'm sure your right!

Don't mind seeing a double penetration as long as it's not double anal or double vaginal. Are these studs bisexual? The thought of my cock rubbing against another blokes cock doesn't do it for me !puke! You got to be a little queer !wink!

Gentlemen of a certain age find it mandatary for the girls to be in nylons and heels. Bloody right too! Not enough shots moving in from distance to show the whole scene.

Where are the pictures on the site? I'd like to see the girls doing a glamour shoot in the gear beforehand.

On a positive note I think they produce some good stuff !happy! I really like the killergram missionary shot. Brilliant to see the girls face as the guys cock in close up pistons in and out. I think it's unique to them?


Re: Pornostatic: anti-anal?

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:34 am
by jj
Porn Baron wrote:
> As I said in a previous thread not so long ago anal seems to be
> going out of fashion.
Hardly, to judge from the US/Euro markets [I don't watch enough of
the newer Brit stuff to comment on the current state of play in the UK]-
more that a couple of studios appear to be drifting away from it.

> Not too concerned myself as there was far too much for my liking.
I'm inclined to agree- but the absence in the above was striking IMO.

> Gentlemen of a certain age find it mandatary for the girls to
> be in nylons and heels. Bloody right too!
I agree that it's usually thought to be a generational thing but
AFAICT my younger friends would rather spend time [and usually
money....sigh...] trying to persuade their SO's to dress up a bit,
than, say, to open up their backdoors !


Re: Pornostatic: anti-anal?

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:12 am
by videokim
I agree with Porn Baron that anal is on the decline, if me or any other lady enjoys & wants to do anal we do it as its not for the camera's but for us. Where porn went extremme for a while we stayed a we were & our customers were just as happy, if a guys got 10" would you want that up your bum?.
Some producers want non-stop anal & if the model wants to take the job they are free to do so, with us we want to film the girls doing their normal sexual activities which a lot of the time does include anal,water-sports etc.
Enjoy the films for what they are JJ or look for other producers that suit your taste as there are loads in this industry, have fun guys.......

Re: Pornostatic: anti-anal?

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:01 pm
by Chris Rocks
It definately aint dying out, thats all i'll say.


Re: Pornostatic: anti-anal?

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:11 pm
by videokim
It depends on the producers & the style they go with, the amateur scene as always been anything goes (legal levels) & never changes but the Pro producers always want that extra pound of flesh because they pay more hence double anal,triple anal etc.
If the girl is cormfortable with anal we shoot it but sexy rather than the old extremme is now the new fashion in porn.

Kim xxx

Re: Pornostatic: anti-anal?

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:46 am
by happychappy
Triple anal,wow.I must see that.

Jock the Cock

Re: Pornostatic: anti-anal?

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:21 am
by jj
IIRC the only 'triple anal' I've seen was two cocks and a dildo- which
to my mind is cheating.
And more importantly, about as erotic as a visit to the the chiropodist's.