Page 1 of 1

Euroticus

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2001 1:53 pm
by Upset
Hi, I have just bought issue 2 of Naked Ambition (Brand New Mag) it is owned and ran by the same people who run the Euroticus Website.

Now you maybe wondering what i am complaining about.
1st: Their website costs an arm and a leg to log onto so i refuse to pay such ridiculous fees as they are charging even though the girls on their put on a blinding show ( especially Bev Cocks and her squirting ) so my subscription ran out a few days ago and i refuse to renew it.

2nd: Naked ambition, Jesus the photos are bloody disgusting, take the set of the hard on inducing Jan Burton, Couldnt raise a bloody temperature let alone a stiffy. The photos of the beautiful girl are awful. the sets that are good are very old seen in several other mags before.

3RD: Where is Bev Cocks, Well she is on page 8 with a character called Mr.Wiggy (looks very much like Deric Botham) where is her set well she posing with this fat lame brain.

kelle marie No where to be seen.

I realise it's an amateur mag & the company have got to start somewhere but for christ sake there is a limit to the amount of crap that fills the top shelves of any newsagent surely.

I bought this Mag and the previous one and it is so dissapointing why has such a company been allowed to get away with trying to fool US the paying public that there product is better than any other.

It is complete and utter crap and i wish to god the girls involved would leave this company before they get tarnished with same label CRAP.

That said i see Marino has left a good posting of Bev Cocks and her Anal antics. Well done Bev i will be visiting your site a lot more F### Euroticus.

Upset

Re: Euroticus

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2001 1:56 pm
by Smudge
Thank you for mentioning this But i really do wish people with a gripe about this company would leave the girls names out of it as it reflects badly agains them.

Smudge

Re: Euroticus

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2001 4:28 pm
by magoo
No it does not reflect badly on the girls. Just because someone works for a crap company you think the fans will boycott the girls future work? Dont be daft. The quality of the publication is not connected to the models who appear in it. People will just look for another mag with better sets. I would be more concerned about the damage to the photographers reputation.

Re: Euroticus

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2001 4:42 pm
by Smudge
Thanks magoo i was just trying to say that not all Companies read posts like this and act on the photographers there are still assholes in the world that do take it out on th Models...... I know im married to one ....God help any one who takes there anger and frustration out on her again ...

Smudge

Re: Euroticus

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2001 5:12 pm
by magoo
Sorry Smudge I think I understand now. You meant the company might give the girls the blame for the mag being crap and getting slated by punters on this forum. I thought you meant it would damage thier work prospects by being associated with a crap mag. Speaking of crap mags have you seen some of the cack that Fantasy put out....

Re: Euroticus

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2001 5:26 pm
by Smudge
Some but not all some of their stuff is pretty good though but i think Video World could be greatly improved there is room there for a vast overhaul ........

And yes you have hit the nail right on the head with regards to the girls that's exactly what i meant....

Smudge

Re: Euroticus

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2001 7:51 pm
by Enzo
I got the first issue of ?uk wives? published by the same people.
I don?t really know what the average price of a mag is, but
I think ?3.50 is a good price for what it is.

I don?t think they try to pass it off as a serious hardcore mag,
It?s more down the erotic route.

First issue contained solo girl stuff, some girl /girl stuff and
even some shaving action.

Not sure what you expected for ?3.50 but as I said for what
It is, for me it?s worth the cover price.

Re: Euroticus

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2001 9:31 am
by Upset
Well i have bought the other mags by the same Company when i have seen them and the images in these are absolutely awful as well.

The girls in them are absolute stunners ie. Jan Burton, Kelle marie, Bev cocks, etc. etc ok they got some ugly ones but hey i aint no oil painting, but the way they have been shot well need i go on.

If this company wants to succeed they had better get some decent photographers and shoot the girls well.

Check the website the images of the girls there they are beautiful girls but look at them in the mags what is the company trying to do. Go bankrupt.


Very very Upset