Page 1 of 1
Producer vs Performer
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:36 pm
by Bicycle Bum
If more porn is being produced than ever before, with more people getting into production, then this must lower profits for producers all round. Does that mean more work exists for performers, or has there been a proportional increase in the number of performers as well?
Re: Producer vs Performer
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:33 am
by one eyed jack
Its better for models as they get paid on the day whereas a producer has to earn his investment back and more to profit from it.
Seems like a lot of producers these days dont care about profit more than getting their leg over but what can you do with red blooded males eh?
Thing is multiply this type of producer by another hundred then you have major saturation of product (something Ive seen coming for many years now)
So this is a great time for female models with so many people wanting to shoot their owns tyle of pov/gonzo (a lot of the time I think its not for publication but more as a personal keepsake)
I can see why this is a bane to more professional producers but it was inevitable with the price of cameras coming down all the time.
I can see why more girls are getting into this and I read somewhere on another post about girls looking like they are not into it.
Well if you think a girl makes more even on a cheap shoot compared to working in a supermarket you can see the appeal.
A lot of girls are gettting into it these days because they want the money and couldnt care for the sex. Then again it might also say something about the people thay have to have sex with too....But thats another story.
Re: Producer vs Performer
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:26 am
by Floydoid
one eyed jack wrote:
> you have major saturation of product (something Ive seen coming for many years now)
Was the double pun intentional?
Re: Producer vs Performer
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:47 am
by one eyed jack
Ha ha. Sharp Floydoid. Sharp.