Page 1 of 6
when is a bbw not a bbw??
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:06 pm
by Dylan Devere
There's an interesting post here about the very lovely Dani Amour.
She said she's classed as a bbw even though she's only a size 12 because she's got big boobs.
So what does everyone else consider a bbw? I'd have put Dani in a bracket of a lovely unassuming girl next door. And a bbw as being alot more "rubinesque"
Being a voluptuous vixen myself I'm interested hearing what everyone thinks.
Re: when is a bbw not a bbw??
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:27 pm
by Floydoid
I'd always thought that BBW was size 16+.
Re: when is a bbw not a bbw??
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:27 pm
by Meatus
Well i think it comes down to whether the person wants to be classed as a BBW or not.
Cause if i'm totally honest if Dani Amour is a size 12 i will eat my own hand. I would say she is at least a size 16! unless she is buying clothes from a shop that sells large clothes with smaller sized labels!
I don't really see the problem with the term BBW! The problem seems to be it puts a label on something. People like Dani Amour or Marie-Louise or Denise Davies or Leah-Jayne, i think they are beautiful sexy woman! Though because they are larger they are classed as a sexy BBW. Or maybe get photo's in a publication thats exclusive to BBW, whereas i don't see why they should be seperated? Why can't Dani Amour and Natalie Heck and Marie-Louise and Poppy Morgan, noy just be placed side by side as beautiful women without bracketing them a BBW or skinny etc?
Re: when is a bbw not a bbw??
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 4:43 pm
by jj
It's not so much the actual size of the boobs as the relation
between bust-size and waist.
Smallish boobs on a tiny waist look huge; big ones on a generous
waist look realtively smaller.
Re: when is a bbw not a bbw??
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:50 pm
by number 6
bbw used to mean fat,and it should mean fat,just as milf should mean 40 plus,anything else is a rip off