egafd.com

.

Brief notes en passant, as it were.
Early-vintage Kendo; too much soft-focus and too many close-ups- in some
scenes you barely see the girls' faces. 60% les is too much in a feature [OK,
I know the scenes were taken from TVX broadcasts, but the selection could have
been more judicious]. 100 minutes.
1) Viola- b/g. Good-ish [marks for the girl rather than the mise-en-scene];
2) Nataly Lancaster/Suzie- les. Unremarkable;
3) Michelle- drill-dildo[!!] then b/g. It's Magnificent Michelle and therefore
[despite the directorial flaws] the performance is excellent;
4) Elle/Claudia Adams- les. Elle looks tired, bored and past her sell-by; at her
cute best she'd have run Michelle a close second. Half the scene is unengaging
side-by-side masturbation. Poor;
5) Liliane Tiger/Angel Dark- les. Professional performances, nice lingerie.
Unexceptionable.

I was given my copy- had I bought it I would have balked at more than a fiver.

Rubbing shoulders with the big knobs again to get free porn..bravo...lol

Maybe they should start describing the scenes that dont quite reach any great heights just as that instead of having us believe everytime hits the spot
Little bit of honesty goes a long way


[IMG]http://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/10592/05514e105919185.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails27.imagebam.com/10592/264576105919187.jpg[/IMG]

That boxcover puff is pretty restrained compared to some I've seen : -)

I only use google in classy mode so i wouldnt know

[IMG]http://thumbnails33.imagebam.com/10607/2fb7cb106062021.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails35.imagebam.com/10607/025132106062022.jpg[/IMG]

Amazing, it's so big!

The 'glamour' shot partly illustrates my criticism- the actual LT/AD scene is
nowhere near as well-lit and shot.

As I said, an ace performance.
Mind you, I can't recall many duff MB scenes- and those were early-career ones.