Page 1 of 1
Nikita and Zara
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:24 pm
by joe king
Re: Nikita and Zara
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:14 pm
by jj
Simple: the 'MILF' is always the one wearing stockings; the other is always
dressed like jailbait. Absolute and relative age seem to be largely immaterial.
'MILF' has to be the most confused, and confusing, concept in porn : -)
Re: Nikita and Zara
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:54 am
by jimslip
"Absolute and relative age seem to be largely immaterial."
In this case you are wrong. The one in the stockings is actually a MILF and much older than the one in the jeans who is actually a teen.
All the same they are both fucking HOT!!grin!
Re: Nikita and Zara
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:32 am
by jj
OK, one exception to a rule that you seem to imply usually holds water.
And you've used 'MILF' without telling us exactly what you, personally, mean by
it. Are MILFs over 28? Over 30? Over 35? Under 60? Do they actually have to
have given birth, or is having once visited Mothercare on a rainy Saturday
qualification enough?
Some Yank outfits seem to think that, once a girl is old enough to have voted
for a President twice, she becomes MILF-fodder.... I'm not expecting semantic
exactitude, just a bit of clarity and consistency.
Re: Nikita and Zara
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:45 pm
by funessex
well actually I think JJ is right in this case a swell, the milf in this one is the one wearing stockings ... or am I missing something?
BTW That has to be the best def of a Milf I've heard in years! lol