egafd.com

I think shes great.... stunning figure... BUT who is she???

think its Katie Raymond

Hasn't anyone noticed the pics of naked children on the same sick page? Someone should be in prison!

Which page? The TubeCup one? Has links to twelve related videos on the one I looked at ? featuring some not especially attractive people but none of them anywhere near under 18. It also has a link on the same page to the stunning Katie-Ann Day being rogered.

if what emac says is true then this thread needs deleting and i'd say the time has come for a complete ban on links to tube sites on here because if there is even the remotest chance that you could inadvertently be faced with that there is no other logical course of action

theres nothing like that on it ???
what you on about it

First of all, I'm not the subject of this thread, so do not use my nickname.

Saying "theres nothing like that on it" is much like saying "helicopter? What helicopter?"
Have you never seen one of these sites before? The animations in the sidebars change all the time. I relayed what I saw when I clicked on the link, some very young looking girls. Even if they weren't minors, I don't want even to look at a site which shows naked girls who even appear underage.

So you may not have seen them when you looked, but so what? I'll bet if you looked now you wouldn't see what you saw when you last looked.

m100 wrote:

> if what emac says is true then this thread needs deleting and
> i'd say the time has come for a complete ban on links to tube
> sites on here because if there is even the remotest chance that
> you could inadvertently be faced with that there is no other
> logical course of action

Don't overreact ? read his post below and he says "some very young looking girls. Even if they weren't minors, I don't want even to look at a site which shows naked girls who even appear underage".

That is his choice but there is a hell of a difference between being underage and looking underage.

I find grown women dressing as schoolgirls decidedly odd but many visitors to this site get off on that.

Some men get off on women who look underage, some don't but it's not up to you to make that decision for them.

There is a world of difference between someone dressing up to look young and someone who is a kid. Don'txconflate the two; I was talking about the latter and not the former.
If you asked me the ages of the girls that popped up on the site, I would say no more than 12 to 14. What I meant by appearance is that these may, just may have been girls over the age of maturity who were hired because they look freakishly young, bur just think it through. Why, if you're not a paedophiled, would you even want to see porn performers that look underage??

Emac wrote:

> There is a world of difference between someone dressing up to
> look young and someone who is a kid. Don'txconflate the two; I
> was talking about the latter and not the former.
> If you asked me the ages of the girls that popped up on the
> site, I would say no more than 12 to 14. What I meant by
> appearance is that these may, just may have been girls over
> the age of maturity who were hired because they look freakishly
> young, bur just think it through. Why, if you're not a
> paedophiled, would you even want to see porn performers that
> look underage??
>
I agree with you which is why I said I find the schoolgirl dressing up bit weird but as long as the models are not underage, others can look.

I've clicked on the home page a few times and have never seen anyone who looks underage. The girl in "Teeny encourage[sic] old geezer with fuck" looks about 25.