Page 1 of 4
Tattoos on girls in film
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 12:08 pm
by Boomer
Bunch of arse, I say.
Discuss.
Re: Tattoos on girls in film
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 12:17 pm
by Caractacus
It's all down to the individual what they want to do with their body. If women and men want to get tattoos, fine. I find them hideously ugly, but that's just one person and one opinion.
Re: Tattoos on girls in film
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 12:44 pm
by Boomer
True, but my personal opinion is that it's very disappointing when you see a really stunning girl and then she takes her kit off and she's got an ugly tattoo somewhere. I've yet to see any design of tattoo that enhances a girl's appearance.
Re: Tattoos on girls in film
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 1:06 pm
by Caractacus
My view entirely . . . . but then she isn't getting tattooed for our sake, sadly. So long as it remains the fashion (second most obscene word in the language, after politics), more and more gorgeous women will be defacing their bodies with horrible designs.
I should have gone into private practice on laser surgery. A few years from now, it's going to be the boom area of cosmetic medicine---getting rid of horrible tatts. Oh well, back to the brain surgery . . .
Re: Tattoos on girls in film
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 1:24 pm
by jj
....and I'll be making a packet un-doing boob-jobs.
Ain't medicine great?
Re: Tattoos on girls in film
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 5:14 pm
by One Eyed Jack
But surely some tattoos are okay? Well, at least innoffensive to the eye. What about the tattoo of a dolphin breaking water on Sandy Egherhazis ankle? Incidentally, did anyone notice that another foreign model by the name of Monica (or Patricia as she is known in US) has exactly the same tattoo on her ankle. I'm wondering if this is a coincidence or a code for cute looking euro bi-babes...Maybe they're secret agents like SMERSH that have some grand conspiracy to de-sperm the world through masturbation so that cute babes with dolphins breaking water tattoos on their ankles will take over the world...You might laugh, but consider the implications if it were true.
Fashionable
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 5:52 pm
by Goater
I agree with you and just wonder how many pornstars who have got years ahead of them will struggle for work when tattoos become unfashionable which they will at some point. Small ones they could maybe get by with but what about some like Sandra Iron etc who have gigantic body tattoos.
Re: Fashionable
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 8:01 pm
by Officer Dibble
Hey, man, they?re already struggling to find work in Officer Dibble's organisation. I delight in giving tattooed girls the knock-back - serves 'em right for being lairy. Most of the top birds don't have tatts (if they do they are usually quite small and discreet) because top girls have got their heads screwed on right.
Dibble
Re: Tattoos on girls in film
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 8:07 pm
by Officer Dibble
"But surely some tattoos are okay?"
Of course Tel - Those that adorn Maori warriors and bank blaggers in Bellmarsh can often look quite magnificent. It's all a question of context.
Dibble
Re: Fashionable
Posted: Mon May 12, 2003 8:10 pm
by Goater
I was talking about the whole picture, major studios, film companies etc really but it doesn't surprise me that certain people like yourself find them ugly and don't want them even now. I don't like any tattoos but that's just a preference. Got nowt against the small tasteful ones