Page 1 of 2

Rachel Stevens

Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 8:57 pm
by Flett
A real stunner who seems to have been missed completely by forumites is Rachel Stevens, of the soon to be disbanded S Club Seven.

Any comments, part from the music being crap?

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 9:15 pm
by buttsie
I've liked her look for quite awhile
Even watched the Sclub series at one stage...I'm over that now
She has a very exotic look until which dissipates when she speaks IMO

Possible reason for her being overlooked

This site already has a
Rachel Stevens...a very well endowed one...Blonde as well

cheers
B....OZ

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 10:09 pm
by Officer Dibble
Forget about that silly little pop-tart impostor. Here?s the genuine original article -





A bona-fida stunner in her day, she had the face of an angel and the body of a bountiful sex-bomb. She was also very bright, feminine and well spoken. Rachel was a frequent visitor to these parts - as I like that kind of thing.

Now you?ve seen the ?proper Rachel? wouldn?t you agree that it would be much more fun rolling around a rug with her (fondling those bountiful boobies!) than trying to work up interest in the most likely vacuous, teeny-bopper, diet-victim version?


Dibble

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 10:13 pm
by buttsie
I forgot to post the warning

Incoming SPAM....lol

It really irritates you how people are still attracted to the less well endowed
ladies even after one of your lectures eh Officer D?

cheers
B....OZ

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 4:57 am
by mex
does nowt for me that rachel s club- i always preferred her mate, hannah- espcially when she had long hair- she alays reminded me of a certain fc lady who i'm no longer allowed to mention on these here pages.

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 5:37 am
by Lizard
To each his own Dibble, but practically speaking, both these ladies are pretty stunning, and only one of them has ?15,000.000 in the bank, I know which one I,d take home to meet me mum.
Liz (gold digger).

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 6:40 am
by Officer Dibble
A financially astute choice Liz, though in this rare instance I'd personally take the advice of my heart and my knob over that of my wallet.

Officer Dibble

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 9:14 am
by mex
that VideoAngels- do they only have 1 video for sale? if so, whats the point? if not, where are the rest of them?

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 2:43 pm
by Officer Dibble
"Rest of 'em?"

Quite close by actually. There are potentially up to 600 hundred for sale. It's just the economics and logistics of allowing folks to order them that is the problem - each video would need to be duplicated to order, in real time. That means someone would have to be employed to do that job and possibly more equipment purchased. Having a good idea what the demand would be like and the price of the videos ?15.00 a throw in some cases, it seems to me that at the end of the day that enterprise would only generate enough dosh to pay the wages of the person charged with duping and dispatch. This in effect would leave us out of pocket as P R Mann's expensive time would have to be utilized to tell everyone about it and come up with some kind of catalogue. So what's the point?

Having said that, the VA archives are a wonderful glamour girl resource, the bulk of it dating back to pre-tattoo, pre-lairyness and pre-plastic tit days. Almost al the girls seem very sexy and appealing, even the plain-Jane's from next door. I would personally like to share it with girl connoisseurs everywhere, and that's my goal. Hopefully we will make some progress towards this end later in the year.

Dibble

Re: Rachel Stevens

Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 7:45 pm
by Flett
I see where you're coming from, Officer Dibs, but frankly, that level of demure subtlety has always passed me by. Each to his own, tho'!