Page 1 of 4
John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:35 pm
by Ace
Not a fan of 'Big' John, but seems justice was correct here. Ulrika sold a few extra million books on the back of her claim.
She is a manipulative lady who actually caused the breakdown of one of my relationships in the mid-1980's. My 'ex' caught me banging one out to Ulrika reading the weather report and promplty moved back to her mothers!
Seriously, he's no angel and his 'career' is finished, but I do think he deserves 'some' credit for constantly trying to clear his name.
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:47 pm
by Lizard
Just heard he,s in talks with sky, to host his own 1 hr talk show, with a 1m pound paycheck, good luck to him..
Liz
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 2:58 pm
by IdolDroog
i think ull find she didnt actually ever name him....if my memories correct, she never said nething cept that something happened so...well...i dont think shes to blame:P
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 3:49 pm
by crofter
Ulrika is a total Media Whore ? end of story, she hosts a show ?Date the perfect man? .... who ends up with the tosspot ? Ulrika, what a sad old bitch. (nice tits though)
Re: John Leslie and Ulrika Jonsson
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 3:50 pm
by Wink Wink
His statement to the press today was said with a lot of feeling........the guy must of been though hell this last year. Perhaps NOW they will leave him alone. Sounded like a bit of a witch hunt by the press, I'm getting to trust the English press less & less now. How much is truth & how much is made up?
ulrika!
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 3:55 pm
by steve56
i agree crofter,her 1st old man kicked her out yrs ago,then she screwed a guy out the gladiators then more,as for the tits theie very small,i refer at least 38s or 40+.
Re: deletion of earlier posts
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 5:22 pm
by alec
Earlier posts on this topic were removed, not because they were a problem in themselves, but because we didn't have time to monitor the thread closely in case someone with the contrary view to Ace's posted libellous follow ups.
Apologies to those posters.
Re: deletion of earlier posts
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 5:34 pm
by Eric
No problem Alec. Thought mine might have been removed because I think that the girl who claims she had been assaulted twice by him should be named. Seems unfair that he was named when under suspicion and his character blackened and yet his charges have been dropped and she is free to go about her business unscathed.
Re: deletion of earlier posts
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 5:48 pm
by alec
That's a perfectly valid subject for discussion - it's been discussed on the radio this evening, not to mention the House of Lords, albeit the other way round that the accused should also be anonymous.
Re: ulrika!
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 6:01 pm
by Eric
Nice tits for such a small back...............................