Page 1 of 1
Mods, why no graphics allowed in signatures?
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 3:29 pm
by Boo2
Just found a tasteful signature image...
[img]
http://photobucket.com/albums/0803/owen ... fe8b5d.jpg[/img]
...but checking FAQ, it says they're not allowed. Is it a question of bandwidth, or what? Graphics are allowed in profiles, so presumably there's no bandwidth problem there.
Re: Mods, why no graphics allowed in signatures?
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 5:50 pm
by videokim
Hi Boo2
Please e-mail me.
love Kim xxx
Re: Mods, why no graphics allowed in signatures?
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 9:31 pm
by woodgnome
remove the tomsk reference from your signature, asap.
Re: Mods, why no graphics allowed in signatures?
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 9:35 pm
by woodgnome
graphics are verboten because, generally speaking, they are tacky and would soon become too bloody annoying for words, as your own example amply illustrates
Re: Magoo & Woodgnome
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 9:46 am
by videokim
I'm sorry Magoo that you've been confused with me but Tomsk should know
that i don't use an alias, i've had my say to all his comments & as far as i'm conserned the affair is over after all were professionals. So any other comments Tomsk gets under a different name will be from someone else he as upset.
I got over 90 e-mails of support from amateur & professional people about the thread. I'm sorry Woodgnome if i somehow got my signature wrong,
anyway thanks for everybody's support & i wish everybody (including Tomsk) a Merry Christmas & a happy New Year.
love Kim xxx
Re: Mods, why no graphics allowed in signatures?
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 1:15 pm
by jj
If you stare at that boob-graphic for long enough, you start to get a subliminal message........'go to ukpornochicks'......'go to ukpornochicks'.
Excuse me, I'm about to have an epileptic fit............
