Page 1 of 2
copyright
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2002 6:53 pm
by marcusallen
Several threads basically covering the same topic.
You steal(mug)from soeone in real life-you are nicked, if caught, are you all suggesting that the internet should be different?-When the wrath of god descends on you, you will bleat and moan"Oh my Lord, Im only........)
FUCK YOU INTERNET THIEVES
I am incensed with the wankers & thieves; being drunk tonight in no way takes away from my opinion
Re: copyright
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 1:02 am
by buttsie
Those foolish enough to think there getting something for nothing think again!!!.
Nine out ten free downloads from file sharing groups like KAZAA contain spyware so now your on someones data base careful you don't visit anybodies kiddy porn site-idiots.
You might be drunk Marcus but you make perfect sense.
maybe when everybody has left the business these little boys will be the ones to take up the slack as photographers and the like.
cheers
B...OZ
Re: copyright
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 4:15 am
by fuji
Well said both of you. I suggest that Daniel comes down from cloud cuckoo land, gets real & does what he suggests, let him spend lots of his own cash, produce some "innovative" porn of his own, then give it all away. Lets see how many times he can repeat the process!! I'm sick of the "public domain" trolls thieving my stuff on a regular basis. Yes, they are THIEVES & PARASITES pure & simple & no ammount of word play can change that!! fuji.
Re: copyright
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 8:56 pm
by golostruda
But, you see, unless you are actually the chairman of Fujifilm, you have just stolen a trademarked brand name to use as your username. I would be interested to know exactly what deal you have made with Fuji Japan for its use and how much you are paying them every time you post a message using their brandname as your user ID.
Re: copyright
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 9:13 pm
by xerox
Fuji is also the name of a big mountain near Tokyo which I believe was named several centuries ago. I don't know if the photographic company had to ask permission from the mountain, but I somehow doubt it.
Re: copyright
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2002 9:30 pm
by golostruda
Ah, but now unless *you* have asked... oh, never mind...
Re: copyright
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2002 5:57 am
by alec
I suggest you read The Groucho Letters, in particular Groucho's letter to Warner Brothers when they attempted to stop the Marx Brothers using the name Casablanca in the title of the movie Night in Casablanca. He threateneed to sue them for using 'Brothers' in the name of their company. NOthing more was heard from Warners.
Re: copyright
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2002 7:29 am
by fuji
Quite correct by xerox, (oops advertising again!) The Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd (oops done it again!) is based in Japan, in the shadow of Mount Fuji, hence the company name. Mount Fuji is a place held sacred by Japanese people & also a common Japanese name, which reflects my ethnic background! Or is that a problem too? lets not go there, eh! It's a name, nothing more. Doesn't detract from the point of the original post. fuji.
Re: copyright
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2002 9:42 am
by jj
Shouldn't THEY be paying HIM?
One of the greatest scams of the 20th century: saddoes actually paying ?30 for a T-shirt advertising fcuk/Cal Klein/whatever. Brilliant.
But extremely depressing: Barnum was right.
Re: copyright
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2002 12:56 pm
by xerox
xerox like hoover is a brand name that has passed into common usage and is now the dictionary. So I'm not advertising...so there! Na, Na, Na, Na, Boo, Boo!