Page 1 of 3
messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:57 pm
by steve56
lots of overacting and shouting again and draggy.
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:04 pm
by jj
Draggy?
I didn't see any female impersonators, unless Ken Stoat (sorry, Stott) was supposed to be a WDCI, in which case the Met's 'trousers-only' policy did us a favour there........
It WAS shite, though: waste of four hours, apart from the devastatingly fuckable Michelle Forbes. Think I'll sign up for signing classes..........
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:35 pm
by Lizard
No please, I,ll pay you not to......
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:53 pm
by The Last Word
Lots of irritating camera work and the usual moody/gloomy = deep/clever pretentions. Felt dated too - serial killers are so early nineties, aren't they.
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:54 pm
by Lizard
That depends if youv,e ever been killed by one...
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:38 pm
by jj
No, no, you misunderstand: how it works is, you PAY me to fuck Michelle.
And buy me lots of beer.
See?
Simple, innit?
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:39 pm
by jj
LATE nineties, then.
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:40 pm
by steve56
mid 80s?
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:45 pm
by jj
Oh, God.....here we go again.
I'm far too old and frail to keep explaining my jokes, however bad they may be. I'll need all that breath when I'm dying.
Re: messiah 3.
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 4:54 pm
by steveuk
Nothing is funny if it's repeated AND explained.
Be generous and assume that the reply was sarcastic?
To be serious, Ken Stott is an amazing actor, but I'm fed up with serial killer stories too.
To reuse a joke, we should shoot less TV shows and more writers.
Or TV executives?