egafd.com

OK so I've spent quiet a few hours on and off trying to find some plane wreck photos from the Pentagon.
I have finally found 2.
One I posted earlier and now another.
In a huge field full of plane parts, luggage & bodies, you'd think there'd be 1000's of bit's to photograph and look at on your TV screens right?

Wrong.

The search uncovers but 2 pictures and get a load of this;

[img]http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/13.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.snopes.com/rumors/images/debris.jpg[/img]

The same fucking picture. A piece of scrap placed away from emergency service and look, it even has the colours that you are familiar with for all to see.
Mickey & Pluto on overtime I think.
That, my friends, is the proof you need to believe the conspiracy theorists are nuts.

The truth is, I'm not the one holding onto a conspiracy; it's those that keep saying the plane, bodies, luggage etc all went into the Pentagon regardless of what the firefighters said.
"Where's the fuselage?"

and while we're on the subject of conspiracy nonsense

moon landings

Some facts?
Funny, but the only foto they offer of the plane debris is this one



I'll save you the bother; it's the same as the one I posted, only much bigger.
3 pictures of the debris in one day, yet they are the same picture from different angles, scopes and resolutions.

Stunning facts Dips.

Any site that dispels a such a bone of contention and calls itself urbanlegends, isn't worth wasting time on.
If it was so obvious and proven, surely a Government agency or Media source would have all the proof instead of some 2 bit de-bunking wannabe website.

Nice try but try harder.


As for the Moon landings, I have no problem with that.
Although I am curious to certain light source reflections; a camera that is already in perfect position on the surface of the moon and not on some landing gear; a flag that blows in a breeze.

The common theory is that they really did make it, but fucked up the footage so re-shot it.
Persoanlly, I don't know.
Strange that with Hubble, we havn't been given acces to the complete Moonscope images.

the flag in the 'wind' has been discussed many times over the years. The aluminium pole holding the flag when put in the ground will sway, in a zero atmosphere environment there is no wind resistance therefore it will carry on swaying for a very long time, considering they were only on the moon for a few hours this is not hard to work out.

Going back to 911, if the conspiracy is such a good theory then why have't the fundamental qestions been answered or adressed by the theorists
such as

why are there no eyewitness accounts of a fighter plane or missile, which there are for the plane (or are these people all 'in on it too')

where are the passengers (even though they found remains and DNA proved all but one)

and as for 'planes just don't disintrigrate', yes they do. I saw a documentary long before 911 about destruction testing. One such test involved a plane being propelled at high speed towards a concrete wall, no major parts were left, even though the plane had no fuel


I don't think we are ever going to agree, but I have yet to see a theory on this issue that has any scientific credability