Page 1 of 2
linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:03 am
by levo
hi people
have just been reading that linda love lace has died at the age of
53 what a shame the woman gave us some good porn films and will be missed anyway i just thought you all should know. levo
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:16 am
by buttsie village idiot
We respect the dearly departed regardeless of how they were perceived,
To me Linda Lovelace started a revolution of sexuality.
Lest we forget..Never
cheers
Buttsie
South Australia
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:55 am
by Bob the Builder
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:14 pm
by woodgnome
actually, she spent much of the last two decades campaigning against the porn industry.
info here:
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 1:24 pm
by rotgutboozer
oh er i watched crash last night and now i am all a quiver.kronenbroug makes fine lager as well as poncy smut.good bloke
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 3:03 pm
by richie rich
As I have never seen Deep Throat, can I ask what is the film like, how hard is it and is it worth a purchase??
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 3:14 pm
by jj
It's actually very funny, the soundtrack has some dire 70s pornomusic (also a hoot), the sex is explicit. A classsic that no fan should be without.
You may be put off during the DT by the (?) vaseline on the guys' cocks, which makes them look a deathly grey. I heard that LL had to swallow loads (!)prior to the deed.
She also later described, amongst other stories of general abuse, an incident in which she went to Hef's mansion, ostensibly for dinner, where she did a runner after they brought in a VERY large Alsatian.......which makes her conversion to the 'Anti' brigade at least understandable.
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 3:17 pm
by richie rich
Cheers for the info JJ!
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 3:20 pm
by joe king
I suppose most films directed by Gerard Damiano are worth seeing.
'Hard core' by Linda Williams says
'What was most memorable in Deep throat was precisely what most people disparaged about it: its "threadbare," "poor excuse" for a plot. Yet in concentrating on this defect vis-a-vis other forms of narrative, critics missed the more important fact that the film had a plot at all, and a coherent one to boot, with the actions of characters more or less plausibly motivated. For the first time in hard-core cinematic pornography a featur-length-not a documentary, not a single reel, silent stag or the genital show of beaver films-managed to integrate a variety of sexual numbers(...) into a narrative that was show in legitimate theater.'
I have not seen Deep Throat.
Re: linda lovelace
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2002 5:33 pm
by jj
Is that you ("not seen") or the reviewer, Joe?
If you, you're missing a treat, as that person said far more eloquently than wot I could of.