egafd.com

Don't worry about the full stops, photo-taker, I?ll translate. I think what you are basically trying to say is that contemporary culture is a load of shite (your reference to sitting on the shitter) and that stupid, chavy, shaven snatches are acting like sexual bromide on all normal red blooded chaps - i.e. the majority who don't fancy the 'er, ?younger? type of female?


Officer Dibble - pleased to be of service

Extraordinary.

A strange post, makes me seem 'normal', good job dibble was around to translate it into an even stranger post....strange eh!

"A strange post, makes me seem 'normal', good job dibble was around to translate it into an even stranger post....strange eh!"

I just re-read it and I'm still perplexed. Tomatoes??? I'm reminded of a scene in a thriller film such as "Seven" wherein the detective character receives a letter from the serial killer he or she is pursuing.

I'm not for a moment suggesting that photo-taker is in any way an unsavoury person but it is a very, very odd and vaguely sinister message.

What with this and his rather weird posts from last night, I'm kind of worried for him.

Don't know if you're trying a stream of consciousness novel or what, PT, or if I'm being incredibly dim, but I'm not getting a handle on what you're trying to say.

The photography on the MET art site is unquestionably high in standard. Whether the content is hard or soft isn't the real problem, though. The look of the models is.

A number of the links that are posted by Mega and Bluetit and others relate to soft photoshoots, and they can prove popular simply due to the model in the shoot. I mean, quite often Mega will post Melanie Walsh sets, for example, where she keeps her pants on. Doesn't stop her being good to look at and well worth seeing.

Sites that cater for people who like very young looking models are on a tightrope, no matter how soft the material.