Page 1 of 3
Galloway - Guilty?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 8:25 pm
by Officer Dibble
So, it look like gorgeous George Galloway has been rumbled again ? being awarded a 20 million barrel backhander from his pal, Sadam. Yep, more documents have been found in the Iraqi oil ministry and they have been crossed referenced with documents from other sources and the testimony of Sadam?s henchmen. The evidence even points to George laundering the loot through his third world charity! It all seems pretty conclusive. Hmmm... You know, there?s nothing I like better than a dapper champagne socialist, like George ? talking the talk, mesmerising the earnest and gullible, while at the same time lining his own pockets and topping up his suntan. What a cushty dude! He?s even more moody than me! Respect, George.
And it?s not just George who?s been doing himself proud. It seems those Frenchies have been on the take as well ? like the French interior minister, for instance. Hey, at the time I thought there was something fishy in all that sanctimonious, anti-war, moral outrage. Load of insincere bollocks, I thought ? these Frenchies are trying to pull a fast one. They?ve obviously got something going down and I wouldn?t be at all surprised if they were in cahoots with the UN to exploit the Iraqi oil embargo and defraud the sucker nations of the world. You?ve got to hand it to ?em. They kept a straight (earnest, pompous) face the whole way through. They brassed it out all right. Didn?t fool me though. Not one bit?
Officer Dibble
Re: Galloway - Guilty?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 8:31 pm
by mart
Isn't it strange that its the US doing the investigating and finding opponents of the war involved?
Of course the US never get up to any dirty tricks.
Mart
Re: Galloway - Guilty?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 8:34 pm
by diplodocus
looks like good ol Georgie has taken up an invite to go to the US to defend himself.
Listening to five live today they were saying other allegations, far more serious, were being banded about by the US, but they wouldn't say what due to the potential libellious nature of them.
what odds the fella gets nicked whilst over there?
Re: Galloway - Guilty?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 8:49 pm
by Officer Dibble
Not strange. The US is the (main) occupying power. It's they who have seen all the documents and interviewed all the witnesses. And besides, it was a cross party committee that ran this investigation - half of them were Democrats who opposed the war.
Of course the US gets up to dirty tricks - as do all governments. But I can't think of many instances where they have been so tacky and naff as to espouse their humanitarian concerns and express moral outrage so brazenly, while in reality, only concerned about their national bank balance.
Officer Dibble - he knows a wrong 'un
Re: Galloway - Guilty?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 8:52 pm
by Officer Dibble
"what odds the fella gets nicked whilst over there?"
He'll probable bottle out at the last minute and get on a plane for Afghanistan instead!
Officer Dibble
Dibble...
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 9:10 pm
by JackHorny
I've found your "chav" campaign both entertaining AND loaded with realism... you're right, old school porn was a bigger turn on - I can recall the early 80's!
But don't for a moment try to convinvce me that this government and the US gov't aren't corrupt, underhand and worse han anything this planet has ever seen before... they'll stop at NOTHING to make themselves lok good, mighty and holier than thou.... They are out and out SCUM.
Re: Galloway - Guilty?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 9:25 pm
by Pervert
Seeing as Mr G is from my neck of the woods, I feel obliged to comment:
I wouldn't trust the egotistical sleazeball as far as I could throw him.
Oh, and called his party Respect and stood on one policy platform---an opposition to the Iraqi war. Fair enough, one might say. But instead of putting himself up directly against Blair, where he might actually earn some respect, he finds an east end seat with a fair amount of Muslim voters and a sitting MP who was black and had a Jewish mother.
Admittedly, Ms King's likely to be rather bitter about her defeat, but here is her take on it:
Here's hoping the Septics do have some (genuine) evidence of wrong-doing against the perma-tanned ponce. Sadly, next Tuesday's trip Stateside will just be another publicity coup for the spotlight-hungry shitebag.
Re: Dibble...
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 11:13 pm
by Officer Dibble
"I've found your "chav" campaign both entertaining AND loaded with realism... you're right, old school porn was a bigger turn on - I can recall the early 80's!"
Groovy.
?But don't for a moment try to convinvce me that this government and the US gov't aren't corrupt, underhand?
I haven?t, I?m sure they are.
?and worse han anything this planet has ever seen before...?
Whoa! Hold on! Impulsive, sweeping statement, alert!
So, you mean they?re worse than the Nazi?s? They?re worse than Stalin? They?re worse than Pol Pot, Genghis Khan, Idi Amin and The Borgias? Come, come, now Jack. If you take a minute to stop and think about it, I?m sure you?ll come the conclusion that the perceived underhandedness and corruption of today?s western governments is a mere trifle compared with regimes who?s infamy still echoes down the ages. We are living in an age and geographical region whose governance is a veritable Nirvana of enlightenment, probity and consideration, compared with other less happy times and places. You should thank your lucky stars.
?they'll stop at NOTHING to make themselves lok good, mighty and holier than thou....?
Well, not quite sure where they?d draw the line simply to look cool. But if the whole nation was threatened with a clear and present danger ? say a 20-megaton bomb hidden in a major city, then I?m sure (and, as a citizen, would expect) lies, theft, deception, torture, murder and war to be deployed to save us innocent civilians from nuclear Armageddon. But of course this has never even been an issue in the past, it was just a given. Today we are, supposedly, much more ethical, poncy and pretentious.
?They are out and out SCUM.?
Hmm, you seem to be working yourself up into lather about something here, Jack. You?re exhibiting a strength of feeling that suggests you have been personally, and adversely, affected by this alleged government corruption and underhandedness. I?m intrigued. Would you care to elaborate?
Officer Dibble
Re: Galloway - Guilty?
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 11:36 pm
by Officer Dibble
"Officer D, with the greatest respect, have you ever heard of Mc McCarthyism, used to be big in the 50s in the land of the free you know....."
Yes, indeed I have, Sir (I've heard of most things). As I understand it, it was a communist witch hunt, instigated by Senator Joseph McCarthy, during the 1950?s, which resulted in blacklisting and ruined careers for many US intellectuals, liberals, and Hollywood figures. It was suggested that maybe McCarthy didn?t care to much either way about reds under the bed, but he seized upon it as an issue he could use to whip up the mob and harness it?s power for his own advancement - much like Hitler did with the Jews and like crap British tabloids do with kiddie fiddlers and asylum seekers.
Are you suggesting that someone is conducting a witch-hunt in the respect of Gorgeous George?
Officer Dibble