egafd.com

What are you opinions on surgery and non surgical cosmetic enhancement?

Do you feel that it's important for a model or porn star to ensure she always looks her best even if it involves giving nature a helping hand?


Have you had any cosmetic enhancement?

If not would you consider it?

Your thoughts please?

It's something that a person has to decide for themself. I'm against it because, no matter what they are trying to achieve, quite often the woman loses the thing that makes her special in the first place.

Sadly, the trend seems to be towards enhancement, no matter what.

Personaly Kaz i prefer natural girls and when i speak to other blokes on the subject most tend to agree, not that a girl who has enhancements is a turn off because they are not its all down to personal choice and if a model feels that enhancements would further her career then why not.

Image and surgery is not really a question of what other people think, it's a question of what YOU think- as it is often a means of preserving the self-esteem of the exceptionally self-conscious. When the quality of one's image is affecting your life, conscience, mental health or general well-being then, IMHO, it has to be done. Not that I'm suggesting you are in this category!

As a career or lifestyle option, it's up to you but go in with an enquiring mind and be sure you know that some of the changes are irreversible. If you are comfortable with your decision, then.....

I think, for guys in general, it is a turn-off. As the other replies to this thread have alluded, nature has done a good job in the first place- it is the flaws that make us unique (what a cop-out!).

If we were all to be surgically enhanced, we would all be perfect- which I'm sure was the ideal of H*tler and his Ayrian race.

It's horses for courses.
Most women get surgery because they may be unhappy with certain aspects of themselves, but as everyone else has said it's all in the eye of the beholder. You can have enchancements that look natural but I find that most of those "in the business" go for too big and then they lose out on any resemblance of it looking natural. In places like the good old US where the porn industry is massive it's seen that those with "enchancements" with the big studios get the bigger bucks (in my opinion) and it's this trend in the states that has affected other countries porn industries as well.

Anyway fake tits or real tits, who cares - they all taste the same!!grin!

I definately prefer natural girls.

Fake tits always look like what they are. Even if they look fairly natural standing up when lying down or 'in action' they certainly don't behave like the real thing.

The same with hair I would much rather see the natural colour than a lovely blonde except for the latest half inch of dark brown growth.

Tattoos and body piercings do nothing for me either.

From the models point of view I guess it is a case of they know staying natural they will only get a certain amount/style of work while they see others getting more/different work and believe if they looked the same they would get more/different work too.
The question is in reality dos this happen enough to justify the costs and possible longer term side effects eg tell-tale scars , need for further surgery etc.

as Ali G would say... Keep em real... I mean It, oh u know what I mean.

My biggest gripe with surgery is when u have surgery u change... does not matter if it is for good or bad...
Think about this girls...
I dont know who u fancy in Hollywood, example...
Ben Affleck
Matt Damon
A few girls I know have been watching these guys for years and love there physical look, what if ben wants a nose job, pec implants or smaller ears, u probably would not like it.

Its alot about familiarity... iv turned on videos before looking for my favorite small breasted lady only to discover after countless movies and 3 years her breasts had tripled in size, hair change everything, I was not a happy bunny to say the least.

Hope this helps all u ladys out there... )))

The only cosmetic enhancements I want to see on a model are some tasteful makeup, a nice feminine hairstyle and some imaginative, sexy, clobber. Is that too much to ask?

Anything else - plastic tits, tattoos, shaved beavers, piercings etc, are anathema to me. As a geezer I find them repulsive.


Officer Dibble

"Tattoos and body piercings do nothing for me either.

From the models point of view I guess it is a case of they know staying natural they will only get a certain amount/style of work while they see others getting more/different work and believe if they looked the same they would get more/different work too.
The question is in reality dos this happen enough to justify the costs and possible longer term side effects eg tell-tale scars , need for further surgery etc."

Work doesn?t' come into it. It's simply a case of fitting in with their chavy friends and peers. Their only concern seems to be looking and acting as chavy as the next girl. One gets the impression that today's girls haven?t a clue what men find attractive in a woman; much less give the slightest dam.



Officer Dibble

"If we were all to be surgically enhanced, we would all be perfect"

On the contrary, I reckon we would all look very odd indeed. Best give it another 50 years till we really get the technology sorted.


"which I'm sure was the ideal of H*tler and his Ayrian race."

It would be really great to be mentally and physically perfect (and who wouldn't want that for their kids?). The world would be your oyster - so longs as everyone else looked like a mong. It's a bit like being rich - it's much more fun when everyone else is skint.


Officer Dibble