egafd.com

Watched "Anatomy Of Hell" (Catherine Breillat movie w/ Rocco Siffredi) where I nearly fell off my seat in shock when I saw a guy sucking on a cock...Not that I'm outraged by homosexual activity in the slightest but by the BBFC allowing this when us pornographers cant get away with this on 18 certificate classification...Now I know the age old argument about porn versus art but then it had me thinking...Couldnt the BBFC allow oral/ genital kissing and sucking at the very least? I mean anyone who sees something like this is hardly going to seek counselling are they?

Lets face it thie way soft is allowed these days they might as well bring in a new certificate 16 cos the content is certainly soft enough for a 15 year old to handle under the existing certificate...except you have to be 16 to engage in sexy stuff of course.

Its just another slap in the face for what the board allow mainstream producers and not producers of adult material. Their shouldnt be a rule for some and another rule for others whichj is obviously the case here.

I know I'm banging my head against a wall here but what do you think? Do you think soft versions of porn should at least allowed blowjobs at the very least?

Lets face it, if the homosexual bj was missing in "Anatomy Of Hell" (which you can rent at Block Buster by the way) I would not have missed it in terms of the story, nor the bit where Rocco pulls his hard cock out of a girls pussy unplugging a gush of hot period juice into a glass where they both drinking it looking into each others eyes...(yes, really).

QUOTE:


Lets face it, if the homosexual bj was missing in "Anatomy Of Hell" (which you can rent at Block Buster by the way) I would not have missed it in terms of the story, nor the bit where Rocco pulls his hard cock out of a girls pussy unplugging a gush of hot period juice into a glass where they both drinking it looking into each others eyes...(yes, really).


this wouldnt make my blood boil it would make me fucking throw up and instantly lose my hard on

Yeah and that bloke sucking the guy off was Rocco!!
Who knows it might have been a fake penis, I certainly hope he didn't have to suffer for his art.

Yes i get your meaning OEJ there does seem to be one set of rules for gay films and another for mainstream porn!furious!

You can add Art-House to the rules too; Romance, Intimacy, The Pornographer, The Brown Bunny, 9 Songs, Baise Moi, Irreversible...........

I was waiting for someone to mention The Brown Bunny. I've not seen it myself, apart from the one scene in question (lets see Chlo? Sevigny get any big movie offers now without having to give some more head first), but from what I've heard the film is utter shit.
Does anybody know if the scene in question from this film is left in and uneditted on the UK release? It's an 18 certificate, and adultmovies as I'm certain you are aware are rated as R18, so I'd assume, in this land of equality where everyone and everything are treated as being equals (yeah, right), it has been editted to be a little less explicit.

According to the bbfc website the film was passed without any cuts and contains "real strong sex", generally when it comes to recent 18 rated mainstream releases the bbfc have not cut or pixelated any hardcore scenes as seen in 9 Songs and Anatomy of Hell.

Another mainstream film that features real hardcore sex is KEN PARK.

i got this french jobbie called 'Baise Moi' proper shagging, hard ons with slapped up rapings an all sorts of business, now how did that get thru ?

Not only that but how is that now in the 'Bargain Bucket' in HMV et al.

And the other point about this film in particular is, if the 'Violent Porn Bill' gets through are we all going to do porridge for owning this?

The argument for this is that the sex is put into "an artistic context" So as long as there is a bit of artiness involved, a reason for being if you like...then hardcore is justified it seems....

Theres an argument there for gonzo versus features. Maybe the BBFC dont like gonzo porn too !happy!