Page 1 of 2
Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:56 am
by eroticartist
Most women seem to to submissive biologically. Male fantasies of dominant women are usually acted out by actresses who are pleasing men.
I have known women who love to flagellate men and seem to get turned on by it but has anyone ever met a truly dominant heterosexual female?
Mike Freeman
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:54 pm
by Alex
>>ever met a truly dominant heterosexual female?
I believe Nora Batty would qualify.
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:30 pm
by staceyowenfan
Lol ... i was going to say wait till you meet my missus but norah batty is a fair estimation...runs for cover
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:38 pm
by rgb
Staceyowenfan touched upon it here, but didn't follow through.
I think all women turn from submissive to dominant as soon as they get married...this is based on many years of observation..not just my personal experience !laugh! !tears! !hmmm!
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:05 pm
by planeterotica
Maggie Thatcher was never a sub.
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:16 pm
by Steve R
Ah, I see.
I assumed this thread would be about Bold washing powder.
Excuse me.
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 8:24 am
by eroticartist
Hi Alex.
Who is Nora Batty?
Mike Freeman
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:12 am
by strictlybroadband
There are some genuinely dominant women, but I agree they're in the minority. In my experience, women like men to take the lead and become dissatisfied if their partner doesn't do so.
It's funny how after 30 years of feminism, the male and female roles have almost come full circle to where they started - although women now have more rights and freedom, which is a good thing for sure.
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 11:25 am
by eroticartist
Hi Strictly,
The feminists of the Sixties were sex hostile and anti-porn, especially if the imagery depicted submissive women. I know I was around at the time.
.
They showed up. at a meeting of NCCL ,now Liberty, in the early Eighties. I remember these angry women, the way they glared at me. Their politics and pro-censorship views created an unholy alliance with the censorship groups on the right. They were "left wing socialists" they said. but really these middle-classwomen were epousing the sexual morality of their hypocritical fathers. It was the old judaeo-christian doctrine thinly dressed in new clothes. Pornography was inherently bad!
No one seem to notice or even care that the feminist's views were the same as Mary Whitehouse's and everyone knew Mary was a stauch Christian crusader.
Now women I agree are returning to natural roles in that they expect a man to pull them and give them a bit of a slap and tickle. !cool!
Mike Freeman
Re: Are females biologically submissive?
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:25 pm
by Jock Strap
You should meet my flatmate's girlfriend. There is no doubt who wears the trousers in that relationship.