egafd.com

Well, I think so.

It might be fun when your 12 but now it's just !boring!

I like a bit of action in my porn, not endless boring tease pics/scenes.

Please feel free to disagree.

I agree to disagree, its all down to the way its shot some of the 70s porn was very erotic because it could only be made as softcore as the hard market in the UK was at that time illegal unlike today where many a producer will try to get soft and hard from the same shoot resulting in the soft output usually looking fucking ridiculous!love!

I'll admit I haven't seen much 70's porn, hard or soft, but like you say the modern stuff looks fucking ridiculous (production values and content).

Nothing wrong with a bit of soft teasing in my book. Sometimes it makes a nice change.

I particularly like seeing old tapes that I have from the 90's which is all stockings, suspenders and heels......and then find them re-released with behind the scenes b/g action added. That's a nice combination.

In today's porn the girl has hardly anything on at the start, then within seconds it's full on bonking for the next 30 minutes. Really just a marathon of how long the bloke can do it for, and positions, boring and a definite fast forward moment.

PC

Apologies if anyone has heard this from me before....!happy!

You have a point! Really! I never understood how in for instance say, a girl dressed up in high-heeled stax shoes and stripper motif is going to break in your house holding a gun nonetheless. !hmmm! !confused!

Agreed the modern stuff is. The orgasm when they cut to the guys cum face, a dude's gurning is enough to put you off your stroke.

Depends how it's done, it's not all shit.

the likes of teresa may,sammi jessup,debbie corrigan,katie ann day never did hardcore so those softcore mags with guys were as near as we were going to get with those girls ,the nearly shots are hot.

!laugh! I know what you mean.