egafd.com

Could I ask for your advice. I would like to know some recommended titles with little or no anal. This just isn't my scene.

30 Somethings and Naughty 40's.

Produced by Tamber Videos.

Distributed by STM Distribution.

In all good Adult retail shops and various online shops.

And coming soon...............

30 Somethings and naughty 40's. 2

I can vouch for that too. Goes to show anal aint everything its cracked up to be.

A right pain in the arse...............

How dare you try to bring about the demise of anal in porn !wink! !laugh! !love! anal is as much to porn as vaginal penetration is if not more and the girls love it!tears!, more anal i say!love!

And may you enjoy it for many fruitful years. I am in no way trying to bring about it's demise. It just does not move me. Give me vaginal every time!

Hey all I said was it aint all its cracked up to be. Contrary to popular belief anal scenes arent popular amongst a certain corner of the market and the sales of 30 Somethings and Naughty 40's proved that. Surprised even me..(well not really).

Maybe the older gentlemen prefers his porn without the back door basheroo-dah-day.

The anal excesses that appear to be in demand seems to reflect an agressive business decision thinking the harder and dirtier the better but sometimes vanilla does best with the main stream. I could be wrong but in the business where sales dictate that is what I have learned.

Swings and roundabouts perhaps?

one eyed jack wrote:

>>


Depends what you call "older", Jack.

I'm 42 which is probably makes me a mere stripling in the eyes of some folk, but a far-out old man to others.

In any case I don't mind anal in my porn at all. What does piss me off though is the utter "same-ness" of around 98% of all porn these days:

Barbie Dolls in their early 20s, invariably with shaved cunts, inflated tits that look like they're cast in concrete, tattooed navels and almost invariably naked except for maybe a pair of "stripper heels".

Yawn. Same old same old same old ........

Maybe that's all people want these days and I'm just an old relic stuck in a time warp, I don't know. But what happened to classy ladies in sexy undies with natural curves? Give me a hot, slightly older woman in stockings & suspenders every time. Yet the French Dorcel stable and the Italians seem to be the only ones who offer this kind of stuff nowadays.

I used to think it was a symptom of the British "dumbing down" of the porn market to cater for the chavs, but the Yanks are even worse offenders and even in Germany (where I live), these days I more often than not walk out of my local bricks & mortar porn emporium empty handed, whereas up until a few years ago I could usually find something of interest there to while away a wet weekend.

Am I alone in wishing that the makers of porn used more imagination and variety in dressing their girls, instead of a constant diet of complete nudity (or - at most - stretching to a cheap & tacky pair of bile green or lurid pink "whalenet" stay-ups worn with transparent stack heels)?

Flat_Eric wrote.
>
> Am I alone in wishing that the makers of porn used more
> imagination and variety in dressing their girls, instead of a
> constant diet of complete nudity (or - at most - stretching to
> a cheap & tacky pair of bile green or lurid pink "whalenet"
> stay-ups worn with transparent stack heels)?
>
>
planeterotica wrote.

I enjoy seeing the girls getting naked in pornos but in a slow seductive manner, to many films these days get down to the business straight away and thats what makes them boring the viewer should be watching in anticipation of the juicy bits not have it thrown at them right from the start, more anal!love!

I wouldn't mind if the Ladies were "Barbie Dolls in their early 20s" or slightly older with classy looks, but what we need to see is the in between parts of the getting naked, where are the ladies with Lingerie? The last 4 vids I watched, not 1 lady had any Lingerie on. When they were dressed, you could see the outlines to some Bra & Panties through their clothing, but as soon as it came time to get undressed, BANG, instant naked, no getting undressed, no stockings, Suspender Belts, Chemise, Bodice, etc. Just fully dressed to fully naked in under 3 seconds.

In some pics posted recently on both Brititsh Girls & Promotions forums recently, Hunny Marsh, LaraLee & Lolly Badcock all had Stockings/Thigh Socks/Stay-Ups on, we need to see alot more of that in the Vids/DVDs.

Now I do like women with a Smooth Pussy, too many times of pulling trees out of my teeth, nasty. Some ladies I have known have been fully shaven, some with little landing strips, even some had pretty little triangles or patterns/designs in their pubic mounds, that gives a nice change & something to look at. However, with every porny being fully shaved, if some ladies had differant styles/types of pubic regions, it would make it interesting.






Flat_Eric wrote:

> one eyed jack wrote:
>
> door basheroo-dah-day.>>>
>
>
> Depends what you call "older", Jack.
>
> I'm 42 which is probably makes me a mere stripling in the eyes
> of some folk, but a far-out old man to others.
>
> In any case I don't mind anal in my porn at all. What does piss
> me off though is the utter "same-ness" of around 98% of all
> porn these days:
>
> Barbie Dolls in their early 20s, invariably with shaved cunts,
> inflated tits that look like they're cast in concrete, tattooed
> navels and almost invariably naked except for maybe a pair of
> "stripper heels".
>
> Yawn. Same old same old same old ........
>
> Maybe that's all people want these days and I'm just an old
> relic stuck in a time warp, I don't know. But what happened to
> classy ladies in sexy undies with natural curves? Give me a
> hot, slightly older woman in stockings & suspenders every time.
> Yet the French Dorcel stable and the Italians seem to be the
> only ones who offer this kind of stuff nowadays.
>
> I used to think it was a symptom of the British "dumbing down"
> of the porn market to cater for the chavs, but the Yanks are
> even worse offenders and even in Germany (where I live), these
> days I more often than not walk out of my local bricks & mortar
> porn emporium empty handed, whereas up until a few years ago I
> could usually find something of interest there to while away a
> wet weekend.
>
> Am I alone in wishing that the makers of porn used more
> imagination and variety in dressing their girls, instead of a
> constant diet of complete nudity (or - at most - stretching to
> a cheap & tacky pair of bile green or lurid pink "whalenet"
> stay-ups worn with transparent stack heels)?