The Trouble with Lucy Pinder

[Bubo]

I think you know what that is already, don't you? She's the first Page 3 girl that I know of who won't pose topless! To me she's a:

Looks: 10/10

Body: 10/10

Tits: 10/10

In fact, she might even surpass my all time fav Page 3 girl Gail McKenna in the "EVERYTHING" department! She's 100% perfect in evey way! But like I said, she just won't even pose topless, let alone nude as GM did, which is VERY frustrating indeed.

Does anyone think she'd have a much bigger fan base if she'd at least pose topless? Do you all think she just turns possible fans off by not posing topless? Would she be the biggest (in more ways than one) Page 3 girl in history if she posed topless? And do any of you think she will ever pose topless, or even go all the way and do full frontal shoots in the future?

[Bubo]

Would you vote for this?

[img]http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y158/1 ... der_03.jpg[/img]

[img]http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/3043 ... th48xp.jpg[/img]

[img]http://soccer.myrice.com/art_img/537347.jpg[/img]

[planeterotica]

Yes Lucy is gorgeous and in fact she has posed topless but only for an artist who done a life like drawing of her in great detail which looked very much like a photo and he was selling prints of the drawing on ebay!love!

[DanG]

I think she's lost a lot of ground by not doing topless. She used to be all over the Daily Star, but now you don't see her.

She's been superceded by the likes of Michelle Marsh, Sophie Howard, Keeley Hazell, Zuzanna, and I dare say the Sun's new girl Rhian will knock her even further down the pecking order.

I think most blokes have just lost interest in her...if a girl doesn't give a guy some action after a certain period of dating, then he's going to look elsewheres for it...same thing applies here. There are plenty of other girls who are on a par or better looking than Lucy that do topless, so instead they gravitate towards them. That's why Keeley's calendar outsold Ms. Pinder's (and everyone else)...she delivers. When Playboy came knocking, they didn't go for Lucy Pinder, but instead Keeley, even though Lucy would have been a 'double whammy' or first time topless and first time nude, whereas Keeley has already done loads of topless work much to the benefit of her fledgling career. There's a lesson there, I think...

I don't consider her to be a Page 3 Girl, more of a sort of neither-fish-nor-fowl fencesitting novelty act...still, I'm sure she made some good money while she was on top, but I think her career has well and truly peaked unless she gives it the obvious shot in the arm of working topless. If she was being featured on Page 3 regularly, doing topless, then I'm sure she get up near the top of the pile, maybe the No.1 spot, but it gets ever further away the longer she leaves it. Newer, younger girls are coming in everyday and getting themselves a piece of the pie.

It's the 'Out of sight, out of mind' principle...girls that are doing P3 regularly are in effect getting free advertising to a daily audience of millions. It gets their name, face, and figure out there, and that's who the guys are going to be looking at and wanting to see more of. Then the really well paying calendar, lads mag, personal appearance gigs start rolling in (remember, P3 doesn't actually pay all that much, but it makes good economic sense to do it), and it's all go from there. As it stands, I think she's in very real danger of becoming yesterday's news extremely quickly...but that's her decision.

[biffalo]

But does she do Anal?

[crofty]

does anyone remember ger first Sun shoot? there was another girl posing with her who I thought was even hotter.. sadly no name or pic seen since.

[Bubo]

That's pretty much what I think. Keeley sure has hell has stolen the limelight from Lucy, even though I don't think she's quite as good looking as Lucy. It's the topless posing thing working for her big time, whereas LP's career will soon flatline if she's not careful. I'm pretty sure I read an interview with LP where she said that she'd actually pose topless once her career started to wane, and she'd do nude later on, again once her career started to wane. In that case, if that's true, then I think she should get a move on, 'cause she's not getting any younger! If she leaves it too long the guys won't give a toss weather she even does hard porn or not! Leaving it too long would be like Gail McKenna doing nude work now. Er, nah thanks....After all, those sultry good looks won't last forever, just as those two perfectly formed massive Zeppelins won't stay aloft forever either!

At the moment I would compare LP to the annoying school girl tease, the one who always gives the come on to all the boys but runs away giggling when she's got all the little boys interested. Yes, very annoying indeed, to give the Page 3 girl act, but won't go all the way like all the other girls will.

[Snake Diamond]

Lucy Pinder has infact done some topless pictures, in Loaded Magazine, I have seen them, & have a copy of them somewhere.

[one eyed jack]

She really is winding you fellas up by not flashing the baps eh? Maybe thats all part of her game plan...maybe she has issues and looks down on the aspect of exposing herself in such a way but like anything, if you dont like it, walk away...Who knows she might feel getting em out is the way to get the fans back...Then again she may be advised to keep em stashed away for this same reason. With a body like that you can only think everything comes down to a business decision.

I bet Playboy will pay enough for her to show more skin though.

[Snake Diamond]

Loaded magazine, a Photoshoot with Michelle Marsh, at least 6 pics of her tits in full colour, full view.

!grin!