egafd.com

Allright maybe hate is a bit of a strong word but it just seems to have turned into a freak show of gurning, viagra robot fucking and misogyny.

Don't get me wrong I like watching a good pounding as much as the next man but the yanks seem to have lost confidence in the central premise of porn which is basically that watching people fucking is cool.

I hope Brit porn doesn't go the same way as the yank stuff.

Zoomraker,
Stop generalizing American filmmakers make all different kinds of porn.
Mike Freeman.

Didn't mean to generalise but think there has been a definate trend towards a freakshow in recent US porn.

All that fish hooking crap thats come in is just tedious.

Hmmm.........

Yank porn is better when it comes to lighting, camera angles, and the girls looking 'made up'. The circus acts like fishhooking, face slapping, and double anal, let it down. The American girls give good blowjobs, but the sex scenes are a average.

British porn has average camera angles, bad lighting, and not many bother with a good make-up artist to save a few pounds. The girls are decent enough to forget the bad lighting..........sometimes.

Euro porn has good lighting and camera work, and the girls are gorgeous. There's more degradation though, and the emphasis seems to be on the guys for some reason.

That's why I prefer American porn which features British & European girls. (without the circus acts).

All my points are generalisations, and there are a few exceptions.

porn nowadays is just a load of crap ... everyone is doing the same old thing over and over again .... grab a girl, strip her naked, shove a cock in her mouth, fuck her pussy, pound her ass then wank off over her ... total and utter rubbish.

And yes i can do better, from a background in the main stream film industry for over 10 years, i know camera angels and lighting and making it look good ... yes i admit sometimes i'm off form and some of my vids are crap but we all have bad days.

Give me the budget and i'll show you what can be done. so please challange me on this.

Not every film has to have anal,
there's no need to strip the girls naked within 10sec,
To much lighting can make it look to sterile, shadow is always a good thing.
Films do not need to spend so much time on close up penatration shots, Explain to me as a man why i want to see a close up off a guys hairy ass... i don't,

And back to my pet hate ... no more self jerkers.

Uk porn used to be good but no more .... there's no real thought put into it anymore.

I got so much more to say on this but won't bore you on this anymore.

MH

Mick,
Some valid points here. I have made sexually exciting films without anal() and when I feature anal it is because I like it to see it. Spunk Showers is my favourite. Some girls really love it too, in real life and in the films.
Mike Freeman

Definately agree about the close ups, its the least interesting thing about the scenes and I think it just comes down to laziness.

It is how the girl is reacting that is interesting and this is seen in her face and body.

If all you get are endless close ups of cock going in fanny or arse it is just really boring and quite frankly it could be anyone.

I don't see much UK porn and don't usually like the extreme end of the market with gaping and spitting and all that stuff, but when I saw Dogging Diaries 4 recently it was like a breath of fresh air in UK terms.

No blokes cracking jokes and posing, treating it all like a Carry On film with cocks. The sex was aggressive but not to the extremes, it was well shot (to my untrained eye) and I enjoyed it.

Zoomraker,

How close is close? A lot of pornophiles like a close-up. I do too and that is why I put some in sex scenes. It is nothing to do with "laziness" and what I am trying to do is to examine a female in an analogous way as in real life. The camera is a doorway to a visual, sexually exciting world
Mike.

A lot of cameramen when shooting porn seem to think you just point the camera down below where the action is , but it is nice to see the girls face now and again and to view from different angles ,a lot of it looks as if it was shot from a tripod as the camera appears to remain static, Ben Dover use to get it about right.