egafd.com

Hi Everyone

Someone called Beelake is trying to get an article deleted from Wikipedia.
One wonders who Beelake is and why he wants to suppress the truth as to why Videx Ltd was taken out by the OPS in 1983.
Please add your comments by editing the discussion page.


Mike Freeman

Who are you Beelake?




Mike Freeman

I don't know why you bother, most of what is on Wikipedia is bollocks anyway.

Fraser wrote:

> I don't know why you bother, most of what is on Wikipedia is
> bollocks anyway.

This is the rumour, but last year a research team did a study comparing Wikipedia to Encyclopedia Britannica and found Wikipedia was just as good.

Some rightwing religious nuts in America object to Wikipedia (especially on stuff like evolution) so they've launched a version for conservative morons:

It contains such stupidity as... "However, there are a number of lines of evidence that point to dinosaurs and man coexisting." !laugh!

A famous author has already contacted me and a book is already envisaged!

If I got the CCRC to reopen my case I would get millions in compensation and a book is the first step.

Porn Gold was removed from publication because it had a chapter on me.

The author of Babylon Blue David Flynt who was raided by the OPS during his research of the porn industry, and threatened with imprisonment, pleased those in authority by telling lies about me in the book( as well as ridiculing my films!) saying that I was in a Dutch prison on a murder charge! No apology or retraction from the publishers or him was ever made!

What is the big secret? Corruption at the highest levels. I have had four attempts on my life and spent an enormous amount of time in prison but the truth is a very powerful weapon and it will come out in the end.

All publicity is good publicity! And that is why I bother. Why do you think Beelake bothers and who is he? Think about it.

Most people just want to keep a low profile and earn a bit of money and that is why when porn was illegal there were only a couple of pornographers in the UK who dared to publish explicit sexual imagery! Wikipedia is brilliant because it offers freedom of speech and controversial articles spread through the net and also appear on Google.

If the corrupt conspire to imprison me again I don't expect much help but at least it will all be there on the net. Conspiracy is so interesting!


Mike Freeman.

Spanky,
I don't Wikipedia will erase it and I think that Beelake has ulterior motives. Why is the truth self promotion?
Mike.

Well, having cast a very neutral eye over the page in question, it has to be said that the text of the article bears little relationship to its title, being really only about one English Porno Director.

Perhaps it might have been better if its author had entitled the article something along the lines of "Mike Freeman (or The Perils Of Being An English Porno Director)".

Steve,
I am tring to get other film directors to come out and add their names! Shy?
Mike.

eroticartist wrote:

> Steve,
> I am tring to get other film directors to come out and add
> their names! Shy?
> Mike.

I am certainly not shy, but then neither am I a film director.

Furthermore, I have no connection with your industry; nor indeed do I have any interest in its stock-in-trade.

I happened upon this site by accident, a few years ago, whilst trying to identify an actress in a Carry On film.