egafd.com

Allan's posts often irritate me too - he seems to inhabit a parallel and slightly overlapping universe with which communication is extremely difficult, but

1) he hasn't abused anyone on this forum, you have;

2) he may in the past have replied to his own posts, but, having been found out, he hasn't done it recently.

You said in response to an earlier 'Attn zip' post of mine on the same subject 'When you see a roach, you step on it.' I just have. Your post was deleted.

Hi

Sorry if I have coused any offence. I do rabbit on a bit I know.

I am happy for people to critasise me, I do take note, and do even with rude posts try and take somthing good from it.

So if somone does attact me, I am happy for the post to be left.

By the way, just watch ch5 sex and shopping, it said that no one would complain if they bought a porn vid and it was dull.

About a year ago, it said on the news that a sex shop was selling xxx vids and when people watched them, they were mild, the same streath as you get on uk adult channels, the shop was prosecuted under the trade description act, as it was saying the vids were xxx which sugested these were hardcore. ~It made me giggle that somone went to a solitor moaning that the stuff they got was not hard enough. I think I would not be brave enough.

Oh well, will go to bed soon.

Been a good night on this board.

Most interesting.

I delete posts which are abusive - regardless of who they are aimed at, and for the sake of the forum not for your sake. If they are only critical I leave them.

However, I do think you could give it a rest - at least refrain from those posts which tell us something new to you but old news to the rest of us - find out by reading other threads than your own and doing a search before posting on a topic. For example, the prosecution of a sex shop owner for selling videos that were soft but claimed to be hard was mentioned here a while ago - and it actually happened several years ago, though it may have happened again since.

OK, sorry about that.

Its with me not being on that long.

I shall try and to a search before I post.

Hope I have not created any problems.

It has been an interesting night though.

And unless we are talking about the same case there has been more than one prosecution for people advertising soft as hard.
How does Little Dave get away with it?? His mailshots sureley are misleading(for years) and therefor criminally actionable by trading standards. I hate the way decent pornographers get busted and con merchants do not get their collars felt. Freemasonry?? It would not suprise me. Uncle Ben went to jail for providing us with what we want. Sorry to ramble on but it hurts me to see DS raking in the cash while decent hard working producers are struggling.