Re: Chelsea are.....
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:22 pm
I don't agree with you on SWP and Malouda being boring players.
I agree that Chelsea aren't the most entertaining, but they've played a more expansive game this year................when Drogba wasn't playing. As soon as Drogba plays, their game goes back to the tight, direct approach with Drogba having his back to goal and using his strength to turn defenders and shoot/play in another.
Can't blame them really, and Chelsea fans won't care how they win because Chelsea isn't a club where they have a history of success like Liverpool, Man Utd and Arsenal.
Chelsea were good to watch under Ranieri, but didn't win the title. To win and look good is something only Real Madrid, Barcelona, Man Utd and Arsenal have achieved over the last 10 years.
I agree that Chelsea aren't the most entertaining, but they've played a more expansive game this year................when Drogba wasn't playing. As soon as Drogba plays, their game goes back to the tight, direct approach with Drogba having his back to goal and using his strength to turn defenders and shoot/play in another.
Can't blame them really, and Chelsea fans won't care how they win because Chelsea isn't a club where they have a history of success like Liverpool, Man Utd and Arsenal.
Chelsea were good to watch under Ranieri, but didn't win the title. To win and look good is something only Real Madrid, Barcelona, Man Utd and Arsenal have achieved over the last 10 years.