Page 1 of 1
Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 12:26 pm
by Porn Baron
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 1:05 pm
by David Spenser
One of Mr Maon's, I suspect... Think I ran it years ago in one of the other mags!
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 1:35 pm
by Shaun?
Are there pics of Tracy Williams without her glasses? Seems to be her trademark, makes instant recognition very easy.
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 3:32 pm
by jj
Dunno if it's a 'trademark' or whether she's as blind as a bat without then, but she's good enough with them on- without, she's absolutely stunning.
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 6:11 pm
by webmasterjms@coolpiranha.com
The only shots of Tracy without her glasses on are the ones where she's wiping spunk off them!
And yes, it is our Tracy. John shot the pics outside a ruined castle in Scotland but it was so cold that the geezer couldn't keep it up, so they retreated into the car and then finished off in a hotel. It was a blinding cum shot, mind! The entire thing is naturally on
www.johnmasonstudio.com
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 6:26 pm
by jj
She's done the odd solo mast. vid where the glasses stay off for varying lengths of time.
Living disproof of the old adage..........
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 8:05 pm
by richie rich
I believe she no longer does h/c b/g films, hope some-one can correct me on this. She does g/g stuff though.
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2002 10:45 pm
by jj
If true, what a waste.
And a growing trend, I fear.
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2002 6:47 am
by crofter
tracy appears in Seventeens Teenage Home Video 7 without her glasses which makes her look completely different and in my opinion older (which defeats the purpose for this video), also looks like she is as blind as a bat without them.
Re: Tracy Williams pics????
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2002 8:30 am
by jj
I'd go for the 'blind' explanation rather than the 'trademark' one as well.
On absolutely NO evidence whatsoever........over to you, John.