Page 1 of 5
Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:15 pm
by eroticartist
Do you prefer the new pornography or the old?
Mike Freeman
Re: Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:21 pm
by laralatex
Well i personally prefer the older stuff. Nothing can beat a bit of Rodox material in my eyes, it's more erotic, girls wear more clothes and usually stockings and for a lot longer. Also, you get more realisitc looking men. Not everyone wants to see a preened, oiled up, body builder type. However, i would say that yes the content is harder these days.
Re: Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:25 pm
by planeterotica
At least with the old stuff the girls didnt spit !sad!
Re: Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:27 pm
by Jacques
Well we got Aunt Peg and Seka and who can't get their rocks off to those two?
Re: Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:51 pm
by BeestonBoy
The older stuff evry time for me im afraid. Swedish erotica,Color Climax and of course the wonderfull Desiree Coustea. The John Leslie stuff has all ways looked fantastic as well but alas I have never actually seen any of them....maybe one of these days
Cheers
BB
Re: Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:04 pm
by Officer Dibble
"New- the girls are generally of a much higher quality"
How do you mean, Alice? Do you mean like their tattoos are more elegant, their tits are of a higher grade plastic, their ribcages better defined, or that their barnets are more imaginative and stylish and that they are generally sweeter, more feminine, charming and alluring?
Officer Dibble
Re: Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:15 pm
by Flat_Eric
The old stuff - every time.
Stockings & suspenders - hairy twats - real-looking females ... I could go on.
By contrast, most of today's girls (who always seem to be either stark naked or in those silly stripper heels and day-glo fishnets) look like they've been mass-produced on some silicone Barbie Doll production line somewhere in deepest Ukraine.
You get the very occasional stand-out, but most of them are completely interchangeable and very forgettable.
- Eric
Re: Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:16 pm
by Officer Dibble
"Nothing can beat a bit of Rodox material in my eyes, it's more erotic"
Rodox, hey? Now yer talkin'. Yes, it's vastly more erotic. In fact I find most contemporary porn not just sterile, but oafish, repulsive and cretinous. I think Bruce Barnard summed it best as ? a post modern freak show.?
By the way, what happened to Bruce?
Officer Dibble
Re: Old or the New?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:21 pm
by Officer Dibble
And don't forget (who could?) Desiree Cousteau, Kay Parker and the ginger-minged, Lisa De Leeuw. Hmm, mmm!
Officer Dibble