Page 1 of 4

Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:46 am
by Flat_Eric
The Mrs & I cracked open a large tin of these sweeties at the weekend, and were both mightily disgruntled to find that there were none of those soft-toffee half-barrels in the gold wrappers.

My favourite green triangles were also a bit thin on the ground, as were the nutty ones in the purple wrappers.

And does anyone actually LIKE the toffees and the hard centres? There's ALWAYS plenty of those fuckers (seems like half the frigging tin) - but they always seem to be the ones that no-one likes, and end up getting left.

- Eric


Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:08 pm
by Trumpton
Flat_Eric wrote:

> And does anyone actually LIKE the toffees and the hard centres?

I do. They're the best because you can really chew on them. Yum-yum.


Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:11 pm
by fudgeflaps
The ones you mention, the gold caramel barrels, and the green triangles are very popular, hence they are getting sold on their own!!

A bit of a rip-off.

Cadbury's Roses are the best cheap chocolates going!!


Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:13 pm
by Pervert
But buy a box of Roses, and there will still be the same ones left that no one wants.

Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:14 pm
by Trumpton
fudgeflaps wrote:

> Cadbury's Roses are the best cheap chocolates going!!

I had some of these the other week, in fact the first time I'd tasted them in years, and they were just too sweet and sickly.


Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:15 pm
by fudgeflaps
The dug wouldnae refuse them!!


Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:19 pm
by Trumpton
I liked the long toffee tubes.


Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:20 pm
by fudgeflaps
Anybody happy at the return of the Wispa?

Always enjoyed it.


Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:20 pm
by Pervert
Is that a euphemism???

Re: Quality Street

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:21 pm
by Trumpton
Caractacus wrote:

> Is that a euphemism???

Err, um, no. !blush!