Re: Trend towards unisex public toilets
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:41 am
Well, the psychological boundary and physical boundaries known as 'bricks, mortar and tiles' and that three-pronged rotating barrier that was two distinctly separate toilets for men and women didn't discourage a bonk. I think the other psychological boundary that nobody is particularly fussed to witness the pretty base, animalistic, unglamourous sight of a human or human(s) excreting or bonking is a key factor. I don't think we give a toss really; if anything, unisex toilets will give rise to a lot of pervs cracking one off to the feeling that the hot bird on the main concourse is in the opposite pink-coloured, sequined cubicle dropping her kids off by the pool.
Right, see when 'sinking the Bismarck' in a public bog, a lot of us are very self-conscious of our botty-burps and virtuoso arse-trumpetry. Do you whistle to mask the sound or do you fire the one o'clock gun loudly and proudly before spluttering and delivering the almighty sound of what is likened to a 14lb bowling ball impacting on a full paddling pool then declaring "That will be a danger to shipping when it hits the Channel, it might even pierce EuroTunnel"?
You then leave, grin and proclaim to anyone waiting, "I'd leave that for an hour", delivered with a Sid James cackle.
Right, see when 'sinking the Bismarck' in a public bog, a lot of us are very self-conscious of our botty-burps and virtuoso arse-trumpetry. Do you whistle to mask the sound or do you fire the one o'clock gun loudly and proudly before spluttering and delivering the almighty sound of what is likened to a 14lb bowling ball impacting on a full paddling pool then declaring "That will be a danger to shipping when it hits the Channel, it might even pierce EuroTunnel"?
You then leave, grin and proclaim to anyone waiting, "I'd leave that for an hour", delivered with a Sid James cackle.