egafd.com

Dangerous dogs

Only owned by macho chav twats who shouldn't have kids in the first place imo.

There is absolutely no reason why a member of the public should want to/ be allowed to own/keep these dogs, same goes for others such as Bull Mastiffs, Doberman Pinschers, Staffordshire Bulls etc. all are tempremental & likely to revert to their natural instincts for no apparent reason.
Nobody, not even those close to them, can consider themselves immune from possible attack with the resultant horrendous & sometimes fatal consequences.
As Bristolian wrote they are invariably kept by macho types for no other reason than a percieved status symbol.
geoff (b217bravo(

Should be banned.

I'm sure the owners learn to love them and think they know their own dogs temperament, but when you've been bred, specifically to fight/be aggressive/show no fear, then no owner can be 100% sure of what's going to happen when they're not around.

Who wants an uglified dog, that costs more a week to feed than your grandmother + two kids, and weighs over 10 stone, making it impossible to control if they get angry?

Whatever happened to the collies, labradors & alsatians? Ok, they can attack, but they can't overpower you physically.

The scum who have dangerous dogs have them because they have an "image" to maintain, that of a "hard geezer", when in fact they are cretinious plies of vermins vomit with tiny shrivelled cocks.

Boxer dogs are rough too

I agree with Sir here.