A new series of shameless starts tonight (I think). But in all seriousness I think it is utterly shite.
Anyone watch it? Can you explain why it is so 'acclaimed'?
Shameless
Re: Shameless
Jacques wrote:
> A new series of shameless starts tonight (I think). But in all
> seriousness I think it is utterly shite.
Yup, I agree with you.
> Anyone watch it?
A couple of episodes. I was stunned as to just how awful it is/was!
> Can you explain why it is so 'acclaimed'?
Could be the case that the producers (right-on media luvvies) are in league with those who give out the awards (another group of right-on media luvvies)?
> A new series of shameless starts tonight (I think). But in all
> seriousness I think it is utterly shite.
Yup, I agree with you.
> Anyone watch it?
A couple of episodes. I was stunned as to just how awful it is/was!
> Can you explain why it is so 'acclaimed'?
Could be the case that the producers (right-on media luvvies) are in league with those who give out the awards (another group of right-on media luvvies)?
Re: Shameless
The first two series were very funny I thought, but as the cast got bigger, they left and good characters were replaced with shit ones
The West London of my youth is now on dvd
I've met the man on the street............and he's a cunt
I've met the man on the street............and he's a cunt
-
BeestonBoy
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Shameless
Ace wrote:
> The first two series were very funny I thought, but as the cast
> got bigger, they left and good characters were replaced with
> shit ones
What he said!! Sums it up perfectly. I was sorta hooked on the first two series,but it's just bollox now (invho)
> The first two series were very funny I thought, but as the cast
> got bigger, they left and good characters were replaced with
> shit ones
What he said!! Sums it up perfectly. I was sorta hooked on the first two series,but it's just bollox now (invho)
'I see the usual gang of misfits and dope addicts are here'