egafd.com

I realise that the unencrypted fta channels such as Bangbabes/ Babestation ect cause a great deal of derision with both posters and producers on these forums, however I have a question:

Why hasn't a company such as killergram/Pornostatic started one of these channels as a platform to promote Hardcore content? Obviously they couldn't promote H/C directly, but for instance if you had a channel such as "Killergram Girls" that operated on the same platform/buisness model as the other premium rate phone call channels, that would refer the viewers to subscription website, in the same way that Bangbabes and Sexstation do, and then reveal a vast back catalogue of full on Boy/Girl content featuring the Girls that are taking the calls?

I would assume that the average viewer watching these channels at the moment would have any idea that hotties such as Lyka Lopez, Delta White, Keisha Kane, Lee Logan, ect perform Boy/Girl?

Its just that since I have recently subscribed to sexstationtv.com, and found not a great deal more content on there that is any stronger than the FTA content on the channel itself, I was wondering why no production company has used this idea?

Im not sure I understand entirely.....but doesnt tvx do this?

Plus you've said 'why dont they' but then have named 2 stations that do? *confused*

x

It ain't gonna happen.

Holly James from Bangbabes could benifit from ECT, she always seems as though she is about to burst into tears on air.

sophiasmith wrote:

> Im not sure I understand entirely.....but doesnt tvx do this?
>
> Plus you've said 'why dont they' but then have named 2 stations
> that do? *confused*
>
> x

Sorry I didn't make this post too clear.... What I was trying to say was: Why hasn't a specific production company, such as pumpkin, Pornostatic, etc, started one of these channels and used 9 and a half hours a night, seven days a week of free to air on Sky to promote Girls and content?

The return of TVX call Girls is using this method now so I see! Didn't realise that at the time I made the post.... But again their free view lasts only a few hours (not quite the same impact as 9 and a half hours) and with the fact that TVX for years has implied that by subscribing to their channels you get to see "xxx" and then not delivering anything other than soft core, well are people going to trust them and sign up for a full 12 months?

I am surprised that there are Girls that do HC B/G such as Lyka Lopez, Jen Killings, Keisha Kane, Anya, Delta White, etc that are well known to viewers of the "babe shows", yet thse viewers are not being told that they could have the chance to pay to see them perform boy/girl! Instead viewers are given the chance to pay ?3 for a lame pic sent to their mobile andnothing mor than that... Sexstationtv.com doesn't feature any HC from Keisha or Lyka, just the bland stuff that you can get for free on tv. Until I found the killergram website, I imagined that the closest that I would ever get to seeing these Girls having sex was finding a Premiership footballers mobile phone in the gutter outside Chinawhites and watching the video files...

But looking at the ofcom website, I see that the premium rate phone line channels may indeed be on the way out, or have to change in a radical way....

She is crying on the inside.

Taken directly from the Ofcom link above....

"We received a complaint that content shown on LivexxxBabes at approximately 21:50 on 17 April 2007 included a female presenter rubbing her groin into a man?s face. "

I don't know why, but there's something inherently funny in the above statement that made me smile from ear to ear.

But....

1.) Why the hell would someone watch something called 'LiveXXX' and be surprised that there was vaguely hinted at sexual activity?

2.) What kind of sad loser would actually complain about it????

Stewie_McGriffin wrote:

> Taken directly from the Ofcom link above....
>
> "We received a complaint that content shown on LivexxxBabes at
> approximately 21:50 on 17 April 2007 included a female
> presenter rubbing her groin into a man?s face. "
>
> I don't know why, but there's something inherently funny in the
> above statement that made me smile from ear to ear.
>
> But....
>
> 1.) Why the hell would someone watch something called 'LiveXXX'
> and be surprised that there was vaguely hinted at sexual
> activity?
>
> 2.) What kind of sad loser would actually complain about it????

Maybe one of the more "tame" competitors made the complaint?

There must be a lot of competition to get the revenue from the calls between the channels, also with many new premium phone line channels popping up on a regular basis.

Many of these channels have periods of getting more rauncy and then suddenly toning down what is shown.

I sure miss Donna Duke's p.o.v segments.