egafd.com

Porn stigma.

In the promotions forum there is a post from Bluebird Films asking who would be willing to pay ?20/30/50 pounds per scene, to see certain glamour models from the live call shows do Girl/Girl or Boy/Girl for the first time.

I realise that any mention of performers escorting is not allowed on here, but over the last year or so I have seen 3 Glamour models (from the live shows) in sunday tabloids selling stories of certain ?celebs? that had paid to have sex with them via the escort agencies that they work for.

Yet these 3 models have never taken their panties off in front of the camera. I fully agree with what Neil from celebsrus says when he states that many glamour models do not want to do any h/c or even open leg shoots, and that fans of these girls shouldn?t ask the question ?will you ever do hardcore?? as this can be considered as pressurising them into doing what they never want to do.

So the question is: Why would the three models that have featured in these tabloids not want to appear in porn or take their panties off for a photo shoot, yet they are happy to appear in the uk?s best selling news paper in a photo shoot, talking about their hourly rate and the z list celeb that snorted cocaine off their ass?

Why the stigma towards porn, yet no problem with escorting?

It's not about escorting or porn. It's about getting in the Sunday tabloids, and sadly, shagging a celeb as an escort is more scandalous than being a regular porn star.

Porn pays much less presumably

Has anyone any ideas why Bluebird would want to charge so much more than their competitors?

Answers on a postcard....

"Why the stigma towards porn,"

Because nowadays it's cheap, chavy and skanky - as opposed to in the past when there was a frisson of counter culture mystique and glamour about it?

Escorting is a profession and the best exponents of that profession are very professional indeed. They would never dream of selling their story - it's only the flakey young scrubbers who 'kiss and tell'.





Officer Dibble

Alice, the celeb chasing charva you allude are indeed cheap chavy slappers - but I fail to see how 'doing porn' would redeem them? Is it that you think they are so far beyond redemption that they might as well go ahead and let themselves be used and abused by chortling geezers because we don't give a dam about them anyway?




Officer Dibble

Alice In Blunderland: Thanks for the answer, that makes things clear.

Officer Dibble wrote:
"Why the stigma towards porn,"
"Because nowadays it's cheap, chavy and skanky - as opposed to in the past when there was a frisson of counter culture mystique and glamour about it?"

I understand what you are saying about the culture and style of porn today, but why do Glamour models consider performing on the live call shows, getting the guy on the other end of the phone off whilst he is having a wank, more "glamorous" than appearing on a video or a photoset with her panties off?
Is there any more mystique in reading out a text from "10 inch deano" asking her to rub her tits and say his name 5 times, than performing in todays style of hardcore?