Too much security for Bush's visit?
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:51 pm
That moron arrived in London for a two day visit yesterday and thousands of Police were laid on to protect him. It was his 'farewelltour' before the useless bafoon leaves office and goes into the private sector to make tens of millions of dollars for myself, trading off the contacts he made whilst President, and the huge monies spent in London yesterday and today would have been better spent on schools and hospitals. I happened to be near Regent's Park yesterday, a few miles from where I live, and the security was really on. The US ambassador lives in a house on the edge of the park and it was obvious, from the security, that the unemployable former coke-snorting imbecille that is George W Bush was paying a visit. The canal runs along the top of Regent's Park and concrete blocks were laid across one bridge, with two coppers standing there, and the other bridge had road access to the park closed off by dozens of huge concrete blocks. Police were everywhere to be seen - along the grass verges, everywhere.
I imagine that Bush, the man who used family connections to dodge the Draft for Vietnam in the 1970's, was only going to visit the house for an hour or two, yet the taxpayers of London had to stump up heaps of money for the security. I noticed today that Bush and Gordon Brown, another egotistical idiot who is only there because he wants to be when in reality a huge amount of his public don't want him, gave a press conference where Brown announced yet more troops for Afganistan. Bush approved of this, which is code for 'I instructed Brown to send more UK troops and he has'. It annoyed me that the recovering alcoholic Bush, who made a fortune from insider-trading and has been arrested for burglary three times, basically instructed our PM to send more young guys over there and he is now doing so. The 2 day visit of Bush to London (the only President ever to have a criminal record) has cost London and the UK a fortune and should not have happened in my view. At least we know this is the last time that Bush, a man whose father arranged through his contacts and wealth for him to become President when he is totally unqualified to do the job, will visit the UK in his official capacity as President. What do other people thing of the outragious cost of this visit, which we had to pay for, and what do you think of Bush in general?
I imagine that Bush, the man who used family connections to dodge the Draft for Vietnam in the 1970's, was only going to visit the house for an hour or two, yet the taxpayers of London had to stump up heaps of money for the security. I noticed today that Bush and Gordon Brown, another egotistical idiot who is only there because he wants to be when in reality a huge amount of his public don't want him, gave a press conference where Brown announced yet more troops for Afganistan. Bush approved of this, which is code for 'I instructed Brown to send more UK troops and he has'. It annoyed me that the recovering alcoholic Bush, who made a fortune from insider-trading and has been arrested for burglary three times, basically instructed our PM to send more young guys over there and he is now doing so. The 2 day visit of Bush to London (the only President ever to have a criminal record) has cost London and the UK a fortune and should not have happened in my view. At least we know this is the last time that Bush, a man whose father arranged through his contacts and wealth for him to become President when he is totally unqualified to do the job, will visit the UK in his official capacity as President. What do other people thing of the outragious cost of this visit, which we had to pay for, and what do you think of Bush in general?