egafd.com

It seems that a lot of you that post here ironically agree with the censorship of free speech.
Some of you have misunderstood my recent posts while others are simply conspiring to ban me.
However at the moment I am writing an essay as to why all so called sex crimes should be banned which I hope will explain my position.
Mike Freeman, veteran pornographer.

eroticartist wrote:

> It seems that a lot of you that post here ironically agree with
> the censorship of free speech.
> Some of you have misunderstood my recent posts while others are
> simply conspiring to ban me.
> However at the moment I am writing an essay as to why all so
> called sex crimes should be banned which I hope will explain my
> position.
> Mike Freeman, veteran pornographer.

No censorship here Mike I just think your opinion about shagging kids is vile and that most of your other posts just idiotic nonsense.

Your "so called sex crimes" are crimes and your attempts to give them justification are pathetic.

eroticartist wrote:

> However at the moment I am writing an essay as to why all so
> called sex crimes should be banned which I hope will explain my
> position.
> Mike Freeman, veteran pornographer.

Sorry, Mike but you will be making no such post.

The nonsense that has ensued from 'Easy 11 Grand Girls!' (now closed along with your other recent post) could largely have been avoided if you had included your 'criteria' in the initial post. Instead, you chose open your thread in a manner designed to provoke the maximum outrage. After that, it's hardly surprising many posters disdained to read your 'criteria'.

We suggest that you set up a blog. Blogs are the perfect medium for polemicists such as yourself. They provide the owner with complete control over what is posted, how it is presented and the responses that are accepted. Also, you will likely find an audience that is a little less redolent of the Salem witch trials.

Your membership remains active for general posts.

eroticartist wrote:

> ....However at the moment I am writing an essay as to why all so
> called sex crimes should be banned.....

By definition, all 'sex crimes' are banned; that is why we refer to them as crimes.

I believe what you mean is '.......all so-called sex crimes should be removed from the statute books'.

I would be interested to see how you would argue in support of that.

Steve,
That is what I meant and although it would be interesting to debate the subject it seems that you won't get the chance as my posts on contentious issues are to be censored by the BGAFD administration.
Mike Freeman.

Mike, how would propose to deal with the use of Rohypnol?

Well I believe people who commit rape (whether it be to a woman, a child, a man, a mentally disadvantaged and or disabled person) should be given heftier punishments than what is currently given out. I think its a dispicable crime and causes much psychological damage as well as physical. It can completely destroy a person's life and shouldn't be dismissed lightly. Thats my view.

I do not agree with your view that such crimes should be taken off the books. There is a reason for committing these types of crimes and that is why they should remain at the serious end of physical assault. You dismiss these at your peril, believe me. These people have serious sexual sadistic and aggressive tendencies which differentiate from a serious GBH attack by a violent thug. The mindset and goals are different.