Woefull England
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:18 pm
So, we managed to scrape a draw against the Czech Republic, but certainly never deserved it.
When Capello was given the England manager's job I thought we'd at last got a manager who would (quite rightly) burst a few egos, pick players on merit and get us playing decent football again. Sadly this is not the case.
Like SGE and McLaren before him, Capello seems to be going down the route of "these are the best 11 players available to me... now how do I fit them all in?"
This resulted in a midfield of Gerrard, Barry, Lampard and Beckham, with Defoe and Rooney up front.
It shows how poor England were that Wes Brown provided more crosses than anyone else... and most of them of a better quality than Beckham!!
Surely the manager should decide... OK what formation do I play, and what are the best players in those positions? If we play 4-4-2 then Gerrard is wasted on either wing. Given we need a defensive midfielder that means a central partnership of Barry or Hargreaves or Carrick with Gerrard or Lampard.
If we have two forwards then they MUST play together... Rooney seems to want to play as a midfielder. So much so that first Defoe and then Heskey were left isolated. It wasn't until Joe Cole came on for Rooney that Heskey had a partner up front!!!
The last time England had a proper strike partnership up front was when Heskey and Owen were paired together. Neither of them dropped as deep as Rooney does, so one always played off the other. Heskey provided the aerial threat and strength to hold the ball up, while Owen had the deft touches and lethal finishing inside the box that is necessary to score from half chances.
Capello got the starting line up completely wrong tonight, and made the wrong substitutions. Heskey should have come on for Rooney, not as a replacement for Defoe. Beckham should never have started, and should have been substituted long before the 78th minute!
None of the clubs providing the majority of the players in the England squad play 4-4-2 on a regular basis... so why do we persist with this formation at a national level?
When Capello was given the England manager's job I thought we'd at last got a manager who would (quite rightly) burst a few egos, pick players on merit and get us playing decent football again. Sadly this is not the case.
Like SGE and McLaren before him, Capello seems to be going down the route of "these are the best 11 players available to me... now how do I fit them all in?"
This resulted in a midfield of Gerrard, Barry, Lampard and Beckham, with Defoe and Rooney up front.
It shows how poor England were that Wes Brown provided more crosses than anyone else... and most of them of a better quality than Beckham!!
Surely the manager should decide... OK what formation do I play, and what are the best players in those positions? If we play 4-4-2 then Gerrard is wasted on either wing. Given we need a defensive midfielder that means a central partnership of Barry or Hargreaves or Carrick with Gerrard or Lampard.
If we have two forwards then they MUST play together... Rooney seems to want to play as a midfielder. So much so that first Defoe and then Heskey were left isolated. It wasn't until Joe Cole came on for Rooney that Heskey had a partner up front!!!
The last time England had a proper strike partnership up front was when Heskey and Owen were paired together. Neither of them dropped as deep as Rooney does, so one always played off the other. Heskey provided the aerial threat and strength to hold the ball up, while Owen had the deft touches and lethal finishing inside the box that is necessary to score from half chances.
Capello got the starting line up completely wrong tonight, and made the wrong substitutions. Heskey should have come on for Rooney, not as a replacement for Defoe. Beckham should never have started, and should have been substituted long before the 78th minute!
None of the clubs providing the majority of the players in the England squad play 4-4-2 on a regular basis... so why do we persist with this formation at a national level?