egafd.com

Just watched some P woodmans castings films.....interviewed via a female translator.........nearly all with eastern european girls....... left me feeling dirty and slightly off porn!

I can't say i have much "repect" for the "woodman"

comments ?

This is back to the 'Independent' thread on the Promotions Forum- like Johann Hari and Andy at Handiwork, I am a left of centre man who likes porn for the sexual freedom and for the empowerment it gives women- performers like Lolly Badcock look as if they are having the time of their lives.

But if it is exploitation- like Kit and Kat??- then I get a sick sick taste in my mouth.

I love watching woodmans castings as nowadays it is one of the few remaining genuinely authentic real material out there.

How you come to a conclusion that a man who persuades a lady to stay and have sex with him in order to earn some extra money is "exploitation" i really do not know.

Immorality in porn is far more deviant and corrupt than pierre woodman persuading consenting adults to have sex with him on film.

I've seen 1 in about 20 that actually had real sound,no translator,no hardcore photoshoot,no woodman going through the formula in dingy room just a proper porn scene(private I think)wasnt bad

The other 19 were fast forward fodder

The questions are predictable and about as believable as the usual Ben Dover anal virgin angle.......the hardcore photo shoots are just filler
The actual real video scenes(not the hardcore photoshoot footage)
once you've seen one.......yawn

So are you saying it is all acting then Buttsie ...

I have seen quite a few of these movies and think they are pretty darn good examples of "reality porn" which by all acounts are real and not set up. Kind of car crash porn that might leave you with a stonking hard on but left feeling slightly uncomfortable after viewing it.

The reasons I like it though are the girls are just down to earth, normal (but beautiful) girls dressed in regular clothes which are slowly taken off (nice strip section but not done in a pornostyle sexed up way) and the inevitable slightly uncomfortable sex does follow - though remember each tape does include a "one that got away" segment. But I like that the girls are kind of innocent, inexperienced and dressed casually (I hate how producers tend to think that they have to have their stars dressed as prostitutes to turn the viewer on - erm why would that be as I have NEVER been turned on by a fucking prostitute type). Also no bad pornstar talk during sex which again leaves me feeling fucking numb as you know it is all for show ...

But anyway Woodman is going to be reviving this series:

Crofter wrote:

I hate how producers tend to think that they have to have their stars dressed as prostitutes to turn the viewer on

I know what you mean and being somewhat a specialist in reality based porn I can only say that most girls subscribe to what they think is traditional porn by dressing accordingly.

Whatever, its all real either way.

My House Calls series years ago (available as downloads on my OMB site) mainly consists of the casual dressed, just after work look (as it was in some cases I remember).

For me there was something sexy in this kind of spontaneity.

This is not a knock against those who like to glamourise but I see where you are coming from Crofter

I don't like those casting movies - it just seems like an excuse to get a extra movie made for nothing. They're usually just a total bore.

The story of how Woodmans movies came to be released is quite amusing !

I've watched a few, including Eve, Blondie and Demia Moore, and got the feeling these girls had been taken to Paris (or where ever Pierre requests them to be taken) then, in typical trafficking fashion, are required to perform in order to pay for their ticket. A bit disturbing....

No, he went wherever the girls were, Russia, Estonia, Budapest, Lituainia, Ukraine etc but yeah it would have been a bit of well if you do this to me you get to travel there type of scenario.