egafd.com

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090220/tu ... 23e80.html

Supposedly for life, but will be eligible for possible parole after 11 years.

So he could be walking the streets and (and most likely reoffending violently) when he's only 27.

A joke really, makes a mockery of the whole justice system.

Kill someone with malice, and "life" should mean exactly that: Life.

- Eric

Clickable link:



- Eric

The product of thatchers children im afraid,thats when society went pear shaped.no such thing as society she said, and she didnt care. Wea re reaping what she sowed.

Really?

And what about Labour's "tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime" promise back in 1997 then?

Because we all know what a load of old cobblers that was.

- Eric

Greed Kills over a XBox i never knew what one was till today!

Totally right.

Thatcher's Children were too selfish to educate or discipline their children for it to happen, Eric.

The Conservative Party is to blame for this.

I loathed the Thatcer creature, but I dont ever remeber her saying..."go forth and breed like rabbit's, have NO respect for anything or anybody and murder at will, I dont ever remeber her that. I do remember BLIAR saying "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime, he definitely said that, before he took this country into an Illegal war, causing most of the Arab countries to hate us, and then making millions as a roving "Peace ambassador" whilst his wife freeloads everything she can get her disgusting hands on...

Hmmm. Lets stop a minute and have a think.

I used the phrase 'Thatcher's Children' as it is in common usage- but I didn't blame Thatcher.

Frank Field has told of a dinner he went to with Thatch where she was as angry at this as we are.

When he pointed out that it was her policies to blame- she retorted that she had meant people to look after each other, and make their own financial provision. Not spend like maniacs, steal if they had nothing left to spend and devise wilder and wilder ways of getting money from the state.

So she didn't mean to create today's Britain.

But the net effect is the same, Lizardo....it is here and it was her policies that caused it.

The analogy I would use is the businessman who gets drunk and kills a child on a crossing. He doesn't mean to be a killer. But a killer he nevertheless is.

Conor Black, the murdered boy, was probably as much an illiterate scum bag as Shane Boyd - if he wasn't he wouldn't have been at the house. So they've probably both contributed to a better Britain - one being dead and the other locked up. This is more a double bubble of joy than a tragedy.