Page 1 of 1

YouTube

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:39 pm
by colonel
Doesn't allow the showing of porn- sex is what nature intended, after all; but does allow the showing of death in F1 crashes and probably much more.

How hypocritical is that?

Re: YouTube

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:10 pm
by Deano!
swampthing wrote:

> you want kids to be able to watch porn on youtube?

Yeah Colonel you sicko paedophile twisted bastard!!!!

Well, actually Colonel makes a point that worries me too. Every couple of years 'the Government' has an enquirery into censorship and asks for public input. The overwhelming response is that violence and not sex is the worry. And like a Ronnie Barker sketch off The Two Ronnies, the Government duly tightens up censorship on sex and allows more violence through. Its like they're saying a big "Fuck You" to us all.


Re: YouTube

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:46 pm
by crofter
Can't watch Pete Waterman videos either ... suppose we got a break on that one. Nice to see that at least one part of the internet is porn free though Colonel - youtube wasn't invented for perverts you know!!


Re: YouTube

Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:06 am
by one eyed jack
If they allowed porn on youtube how depressing would it be if it was awash with the stuff.

I like youtube just the way it is and porn should know its place


Re: YouTube

Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:01 am
by colonel
I think that maybe you all- or I- missed the point.

I'm not saying put porn on YouTube- but why so much violence and actual death?

Re: YouTube

Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:20 am
by Peter
It may not be around much longer unless they can work out how to profit from it.

C4 news said last night (as part of Susan Boyle mania) that it costs around $1bn a year to run, yet make only around $200m income.

Re: YouTube

Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:20 pm
by stevieq
I agree with porn not being on Youtube, that kids can log onto....

BUT you can get porn from....youporn.com

And its free downloading too.

Not sure if its a branch of youtube.