Page 1 of 1

Topless versus Bottomless

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:15 am
by Deano!
Topless girls are always welcome on my TV, but if they really want me to wank-off at them furiously they should go bottomless. There is something about chicks with a nice business-like blazer on up above but no pants, no knickers - just stockings and stilettos down below. I would love to have a secretary like that.

Am I alone in this fetish?


Re: Topless versus Bottomless

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:58 pm
by dynatech

Re: Topless versus Bottomless

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:21 pm
by Brainsinmedick
covered top and bare bum is great.

Re: Topless versus Bottomless

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:36 am
by Deano!
dynatech wrote:

> No mate, you are not alone!
>
> http://galleries2.ftvcash.com/First-Tim ... 33/1368320
>

Thanks for the link. Yes, I like Alison too. I remember when she was a 'non-nude' only girl.