egafd.com

Ofcon have been consulting (that means listening to Harriet Harperson and Guadrain Reeders) about the FTA 900 number channels. It seems that before the consultation has closed the girls have been told to tone down their already tame acts. No beaver at 1am on 954 but uncut episodes of Eurotrash are fine at 10pm on Bravo or Virgin 1. Eh???

Makes ya weep, our men and women are in an unwinable war, over 1000000 various cases of assault last year, murders, rapes, robbery, crooked bankers and power companies all screwing us, under no control whatsover and so on and so forth..............

But you can sleep soundly in your bed tonight knowing that those OFCOM WANKERS have protected you from getting a glance at some pussy!

So often, child molesters turn out to be from the 'respectable' end of society - clergymen, teachers, coppers, various youth workers etc.

I can't recall hearing one single case of a person involved in the porno biz involved in paedophillia. And yet the people in charge continue to restrict material featuring nothing but over 18 year olds (sometimes way over 18!). eg. "Three more priests jailed for kiddie fiddling. Govt to crack down on sex shops."

Well, its about time.

I find the antics of Ms. Dani O Neal and company entirely arousing and that should be stopped.

I often flick round the channels late at night (as I am sure many of us do).

I have Sky and in the movies section (listed after the Sky movies) are a few channels called something like "Movies for men".

During the day they show war movies, but late in the evening they show softcore adult movies.

But I have been surprised at how much nudity, sex, and hairy bushes I have seen on these unencrypted channel.

In fact the other day I went onto the Playboy channel and paid my ?5 for a nights viewing (mainly to see how "strong" it was).

I have to say it was a total ripoff. I watched for 2 hours and did not even see a single bush.

In fact programs like Sexorama and similar programs on late night TV on Virgin 1 (and other channels) show more sex and nudity than this Playboy channel did.

For those thinking of spending any money on a nights viewing of Playboy, forget it.

British censorship is a joke and very baffling. I can go into a newsagent not 300 yards from here and buy a comic, the local paper or Cheri magazine showing models being DP'd and jizzed on. But can't see a flash of beaver on a adult channel at 130am.

Thats why we stopped BBFC our films as people don't like censorship, the times we have worked with police to help break pedo rings & the goverment still don't give the industry any slack.

Kim x

It's a massive leap but the way the government are imposing new laws etc all over the place, I predict a civil war in the next 20 years. People just won't stand for it, the middle classes are making less and less in their wages, taxes are rising, petrol etc. the rich get richer and the poor get everything paid for.

/rant

Maybe there is another theory for OFCOMS interest. Being that British Justice is totally RE-active, eg you could be beaten to a pulp outside a police station and they would do nothing to help unless someone actually made a complaint. So maybe OFCOM is only reacting to complaints, but complaints actually generated by the dozens of softcore TV station themselves, ie NOT the public! In other words the TV companies are snitching on each other in an attempt to undermine their competition, but ultimately causing more trouble for themselves.

I reckon OFCOM actually doesn't give a toss, but they will react to complaints. For example in the 1970's the twisted old bag, Mary Whitehouse wielded huge power over the BBC with her organisation "The National TV Viewers Association" or some bollocks. Apparently at its height the organisation only had about 58 members!

So even then the general public didn't give a toss, let alone now. I reckon the staff at OFCOM want to do what all other civil servants do, ie:

1/ Get hugely paid.
2/ Do absoluteley nothing apart from sipping tea.
3/ Retire on a gold plated pension.

So why spend all their time sifting through hours of TV footage looking for the odd muff shot? Doesn't make sense. Obviously they can rake in a ?20,000 fine here and there, but they don't get it, the crooked gvernment gets it.

We flatter ourselves to think the authorities actually give a damn about the morality of what we do any more.

mp3 wrote:

It's a massive leap but the way the government are imposing new laws etc all over the place, I predict a civil war in the next 20 years. People just won't stand for it, the middle classes are making less and less in their wages, taxes are rising, petrol etc. the rich get richer and the poor get everything paid for.


Nah..the majority of Britain have no spine. We like to moan but not actually do anything about it...or expected for it to be handed on a plate for us

50% of peoples homes in repossession, banks shafting us in the world economy, winning the right to charge for overdrafts, rising costs, interest rates and charges as well as spending cuts would have had most coutnries outside the EU in a riot but Britain? No offense but we are sheep, pacified with drugs, alcohol, tv and obsessed with celebrity culture or rather some of us have it foisted on us to the point it is inescapable.

If enough people got off their arses and protested you might make a difference but if anyone stood up to the system with this subversive behaviour you'd most likely be accused of being a member of some obscure non existent splinter cell for some terrorist movement