egafd.com

If anyones interested here's the documentary by the guy the McCanns are suing in Portugal. This programme I believe has been broadcast in parts of Europe but not here. It's interesting to see the alternative view. 6 parts about an hour long.

The mcCanns are slippery. Very slippery.

He`s still a profiteering scumbag though, not some righteous crusader persuing the truth

If you watch the documentary carefully, it would appear that both the Portuguese and British police think there is something fishy going on. The McCanns are so powerful and well connected, that neither police force dare proceed any further.

Is anyone allowed to mention they left their kids home alone yet?

Or has the major contributing factor, in any scenario which doesn't involve them doing it, been airbrushed out?

Watch out you could be sued for saying that! !wink!

It still doesn't get away from the fact that Amaral has made the Keystone Kops look professional.
The man is a complete shithead, no matter what the McCanns may or not be guilty of.

Thank you for providing the link to this Jim Slip. Eye opening viewing.

One of the Mccann's friends, who was on holiday with them at the time of Madeleine's disappearance, is called David Payne.

Type "david payne madeleine mccann" into google and look at the first result.

So let's get this right Jim,

You are suggesting that this provides an alternative view of the McCanns.

Are you also aware that Amaral was charged with covering up the torture of a mum by three of his colleagues in order to get a confession in another child case?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... 790499.ece

The scumbag was also found guilty as charged.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldne ... -case.html

Having been kicked off the McCann case, this scumbag took early retirement and is now trying to earn a few quid with this crap.

And you expect us to take seriously the views of a policeman who was kicked off the case and separately found guilty of falsifying evidence?


D

David Johnson wrote:


> Are you also aware that Amaral was charged with covering up the
> torture of a mum by three of his colleagues in order to get a
> confession in another child case?
>

Some more information in "The other child case", which conveniently was left out of the Daily Mail and Sun articles:

The mum of three, Leonor Cipriano, reported to Police her daughter (Joana) had disappeared two days after her original disappearance.

The body of Joana Cipriano was never found, but samples of her blood were found in her mothers freezer. Her mother justified those samples of blood admitting she had beaten Joana.

Leonor Cipriano and her brother, who were in an incestuous relationship, were sentenced to 16 years in jail for the murder of her daughter.

Before the trial, Leonor Cipriano accused five CID officers of beating her, trying to extract a confession.

The Public Prosecutor?s Office opened a criminal investigation and ordered a police line-up.

The Public Prosecutor?s Office magistrate that was in charge of the criminal investigation decided to accuse five CID officers (which did not include Amaral), but didn?t mentioned, in the accusation sent to the Court, that Leonor Cipriano couldn?t identify any of the aggressors, in the police line-up.

Leonor Cipriano never confessed the murder of her daughter. Her brother, in a letter written from jail, accused Leonor Cipriano of selling the daughter.

Evidence presented before the jury, who found a guilty verdict, was that after beating the child and causing an unintentional death, they decided to get rid of her body and cut it in pieces, keeping some of them in the freezer, while they gave the other pieces to be eaten by pigs.

Once again, note how those articles refer to Leonor Cipriano as "a mum" not a "a mum who was convicted of murder and was found guilty by a jury of carving up her daughters body and feeding it to pigs".

David Johnson, I realise you didn't state otherwise, however Amaral was not implicated in the actual torture, neither was he in any way accused of falsifying evidence in the actual murder case.


> The scumbag was also found guilty as charged.
>

Who is the bigger "scumbag"? The murderers or Amaral?


> Having been kicked off the McCann case, this scumbag took early
> retirement and is now trying to earn a few quid with this crap.
>


Why was he kicked off the case? Which parts of the book do you consider to be crap?