Reservoir Dogs..
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:35 am
I tried to watch this film again last night but it is just so violent that I stopped watching. I saw it in the cinema when it first came out and I think I have seen it twice since on video or DVD but I have always skipped over the torture scene as I find it very disturbing to watch. Last night I lost interest in the film after about 20 minutes.
I believe you can convey heavy things to the audience by implying things rather than having to show them vividly and graphically. A good example of this is the film The Silence Of The Lambs where a lot of what happens occurs off camera and you dont see it. During the scene where Hannibal Lecter escapes and does some very nasty things to the two Policemen who had brought him his dinner, it keeps cutting to shots of the SWAT team in the lift and then cutting back. You actually see very little of what is happening but you feel the impact of what is happening.
I don't know why Tarantino feels the need to shock and disturb the viewer when the vibe of what is happening can be put across to the audience more subtely. I think the man is just obsessed with violence and gore. What do other people think about Reservoir Dogs, whether it needed to be so violent and also this issue of how things can be implied to the viewer rather than shown and that thing still have the same impact.
I think it is cheap shoddy film making to just go for shock when a better film-maker would imply it. I think Quentin Tarantino would be a weird person to know if you knew him in his private life.
I believe you can convey heavy things to the audience by implying things rather than having to show them vividly and graphically. A good example of this is the film The Silence Of The Lambs where a lot of what happens occurs off camera and you dont see it. During the scene where Hannibal Lecter escapes and does some very nasty things to the two Policemen who had brought him his dinner, it keeps cutting to shots of the SWAT team in the lift and then cutting back. You actually see very little of what is happening but you feel the impact of what is happening.
I don't know why Tarantino feels the need to shock and disturb the viewer when the vibe of what is happening can be put across to the audience more subtely. I think the man is just obsessed with violence and gore. What do other people think about Reservoir Dogs, whether it needed to be so violent and also this issue of how things can be implied to the viewer rather than shown and that thing still have the same impact.
I think it is cheap shoddy film making to just go for shock when a better film-maker would imply it. I think Quentin Tarantino would be a weird person to know if you knew him in his private life.