egafd.com

Jimbo,
I am getting a tad concerned by your increasingly out of control messages on this forum.

Could you perhaps take a leaf out of the good forumites such as Lizard and Max?

Mr Fukwit posted a message giving some info about refugees allowances compared to UK pensioner allowances. I replied stating that I didn't think the info was correct and asked for clarification. Reasonable enough request I would have thought, old chap.
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=246366&t=246366

but alas no. It produced an apoplectic, full on, coronary inducing (in you) response including "Mr Fuckwit, you should realise that you are not permitted to make observations, (by me)" I suspect I was not alone in finding the response very funny in a let's watch Jimbo take the piss out of himself without realising it way, but a bit concerning at the same time.

So are you trying to prevent me, Lizard and Max, who also queried Roger's info, to question the facts that Roger used by accusing us of being politically correct toerags because we said "are you sure this info is correct"?

If so, as a self-appointed BGAFD Thought Policeman could you please outline for all forumites what we must think on a range of political topics in order to avoid being called Fascist, Commie, pc, etc etc if we do not adhere to said strict Jimbo thought control guidelines.

We await your response with interest, but please don't be angry Jimbo. Think of your blood pressure, old bean!

Thanks in anticipation
David

Curious though how in this post you refer in slightly less aggressive terms to Roger as "Mr Fukwit"

Whereas your immediate response to the original post was with the subject line: "Fuckwit"

When I wrote Fuckwit it was a mistake. I honestly thought that was his user name. The difference between Fuckwit and Fukwit is obviously small.

Oh for an edit option on messages. If you read the content of my message to Roger, it is very polite and in no way insulting despite his having a different view of the world to mine on this subject.

I apologise unreservedly for any offence it may have caused. And I have no problem apologising again where necessary.

My basic modus operandi on this forum is that if someone treats me with respect, I have no problem doing likewise to them.

If on the other hand someone insults me (a classic would be stuff like Bigmac suggesting I am a paedophile ), I tend to respond not with a tirade of four letter insults but by typically showing them the contempt I think they deserve by treating their comments with disdain or alternatively simply ignoring them.

I admit to going over the top on occasions. However, I certainly am not someone to turn the other cheek when insulted on this forum and for that I have no intention of apologising.

So people who have no other aim on this forum other than to insult people who disagree with their views rather than to attempt and have a half sensible debate, you know where you stand!

Cheers
D

"Whereas your immediate response to the original post was with the subject line: "Fuckwit" Well spotted, Sir!

In spite of David's protestations of innocence, he forgets that he has a well earned reputation for aggression and menace, which he levels at anyone who poses topics that defy his strict code on Political Correctness, that he believes must be enforced by him, on a, may I remind one and all, hard core porn forum!!

So I think a jury, in this case would find David Johnson, "Guilty as charged!" David's reputation, precedes him!

Jimbo states to Alex

""Whereas your immediate response to the original post was with the subject line: "Fuckwit" Well spotted, Sir!"

Extract from Jimbo's post to Roger

"Mr Fuckwit, you should realise that you are not permitted to make observations,"

!oops! !grin!

Cheers
D

We are still waiting for your guidelines

"could you please outline for all forumites what we must think on a range of political topics in order to avoid being called Fascist, Commie, pc, etc etc if we do not adhere to said strict Jimbo thought control guidelines."

"When I wrote Fuckwit it was a mistake"

Fair comment, in the first instance it did just appear to be a response to figures with which you did not agree.

Not that I was trying to be one of those other God awful New Labour inventions, the Civil Enforcement Officer. !wink!

"Not that I was trying to be one of those other God awful New Labour inventions, the Civil Enforcement Officer."

Oh, so that was who visited me in the early hours this morning? I knew I should have paid my TV license.

He was really, really mean to me!

Cheers
D